Re: Which make binary to use for Windows?
Hi Michael, Thorsten, Thanks for answering. I tested LODE and it built without problem. So I've submitted a patch to fix the warning: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/65882/ . Michael Stahl 於 2019年1月7日 週一 下午8:14寫道： > On 03.01.19 15:07, Mark Hung wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After libcdr and libqxp upgraded, I could no longer build them in my > > environment. Make dependencies failed at 'mkdir -p'. Though solution > > proposed https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/65769/ worked me, I > wondered > > why Jenkins didn't complain. > > > > I compared three versions of make - > > > > Cygwin released GNU make 4.2 : ok > > Prebuild binary: > > https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bin/cygwin/make-85047eb-msvc.exe: > failed. > > that's interesting, i wasn't aware of that. > > GNU make 4.2 built by my self following autogen.sh instructions: ok > > this is the latest one: > > https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bin/cygwin/make-4.2.1-msvc.exe > > it's built with MSVC, for Win32. > > > Which version is expected? Is the warning message popped out when > > running autogen.sh with Cygwin released GNU make "Your make version is > > known to be horribly slow" still legitimate? > > yes Cygwin make is horribly slow, so use a Win32 build, see > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014-June/061727.html > Thanks. -- Mark Hung ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Which make binary to use for Windows?
On 03.01.19 15:07, Mark Hung wrote: Hi, After libcdr and libqxp upgraded, I could no longer build them in my environment. Make dependencies failed at 'mkdir -p'. Though solution proposed https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/65769/ worked me, I wondered why Jenkins didn't complain. I compared three versions of make - Cygwin released GNU make 4.2 : ok Prebuild binary: https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bin/cygwin/make-85047eb-msvc.exe: failed. that's interesting, i wasn't aware of that. GNU make 4.2 built by my self following autogen.sh instructions: ok this is the latest one: https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/bin/cygwin/make-4.2.1-msvc.exe it's built with MSVC, for Win32. Which version is expected? Is the warning message popped out when running autogen.sh with Cygwin released GNU make "Your make version is known to be horribly slow" still legitimate? yes Cygwin make is horribly slow, so use a Win32 build, see https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014-June/061727.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Which make binary to use for Windows?
Hi Mark, Mark Hung wrote: > Which version is expected? > For Windows, usually your best bet is to run with the LODE setup (that also covers quite a bit more than just gnumake): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/lode#Windows_Bootstrapping_.28Windows_user_only.29 (that's also what CI is using, and it's therefore quite well maintained) HTH, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
