On 01/05/17 21:38, Markus Fischer wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.05.2017 um 21:02 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>
>> I feel it is dangerous to mix too many different political causes with
>> free software.
>
> I feel it is dangerous not to care about our own economical decisions.
> Why should we care about the
Am 01.05.2017 um 21:02 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
I feel it is dangerous to mix too many different political causes with
free software.
I feel it is dangerous not to care about our own economical
decisions. Why should we care about the software we use then...
I would like to know that
On 01/05/17 20:20, Markus Fischer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I read only about price and cost cutting. What's about sustainability,
> working conditions, clean production etc. ?
>
I feel it is dangerous to mix too many different political causes with
free software.
I would like to know that people
In my opinion there are other solutions for ISP's to prevent malware/viruses
than blocking port 80.
Maybe these ISP's only support https on 443? Regarding privacy concerns over
unencrypted protocols like port 80, that seems to me no bad policy.
One of the main reason for existence of ISP's is
On 01/05/17 18:49, John Sullivan wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There has been some discussion on debian-project about merchandise
>> production, mainly t-shirts and clothing[1] and one thing that came up
>> is the question of collaboration between
What are people's opinions on this? ISPs block 80 on consumer internet
connections purportedly to prevent the spread of malware and viruses. I
think it is in infringement on free speech. I have had ISPs in Hawaii
and Missouri where this isn't done and you are free to run your web
server on
Daniel Pocock writes:
> Hi all,
>
> There has been some discussion on debian-project about merchandise
> production, mainly t-shirts and clothing[1] and one thing that came up
> is the question of collaboration between multiple projects.
>
> Can people from any other
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:13:58AM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> For that to work, the dual-licensing would stablish rules such that only
> the "proven to be /libre/" projects would be allowed for that
> exception. My opinion on this is that there would need to have a through
> approval
For that to work, the dual-licensing would stablish rules such that only
the "proven to be /libre/" projects would be allowed for that
exception. My opinion on this is that there would need to have a through
approval process instead of simply relying on the judgement of the
project seeking to make