Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] musings on disruption and competition [was] It’s the Latency, FCC

> On Apr 30, 2024, at 10:48 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > > Hi Frank. > > On 1 May 2024 09:27:37 CEST, Frantisek Borsik via Starlink > mailto:starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net>> > wrote: >> Basically, Eugene, the situation you are describing is calling for a >> competitor to disrupt them! >

Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Pick up the glove? I can be part of a team. I am not as close as to the equipment as I used to be. I need help assembling a demo configuration that can engage the subscribers. Building a local team for this has been very slow going. I like helping a market #3 or #4 disrupt an incumbent. In most

Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Hey Jim, >From the trace it looks like the server is in South Africa (second last hop is Liquids Harare POP) Results before turning on LibreQOS were pretty bad C-F. Thanks, Brian On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 3:26 PM, Jim Forster wrote: > Brian, > > A+ — fantastic! > > Any guesses or memory of what

Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Brian, A+ — fantastic! Any guesses or memory of what it would be without LibreQoS? Where’s the Waveform server? I’m curious what a trace route to that sever looks like from CTN — Jim > On May 1, 2024, at 3:32 AM, Brian Munyao Longwe via LibreQoS > wrote: > > Just got this result from

Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] musings on disruption and competition [was] It’s the Latency, FCC

Hi Frank. On 1 May 2024 09:27:37 CEST, Frantisek Borsik via Starlink wrote: >Basically, Eugene, the situation you are describing is calling for a >competitor to disrupt them! [SM] Not a big fan of the silicon valley nomenclature... 'disruption' evokes thoughts of 'revolutionary' yet what

Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Basically, Eugene, the situation you are describing is calling for a competitor to disrupt them! This is such an old story - so many ISPs, especially WIPSs, started just because they either didn't have any option or all those options available were really terrible. Don't you want to pick up the

Re: [LibreQoS] [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC

Thanks for the comments, Jim. I'm adding Sina , CEO at Waveform, to the conversation. Maybe he will have some answers... All the best, Frank Frantisek (Frank) Borsik https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: