Re: [LIB] Windows install fails on 110CT

2003-01-01 Thread Richard T. Waters
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 13:50:41 -0500 From: Richard T. Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Windows install fails on 110CT I have had similar behavior (although not during install) and on both occasions it turned out that the CMOS/RTC battery was discharged. The first time, as I had just

Re: [LIB] Problem Device

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Hanson
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 20:41:21 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device Lee... Anything to report on this? I've had the same problem with SE, not that it's any problem. However I've found that my installations of SE on my L100 are a lot more unstable

Re: [LIB] Windows install fails on 110CT

2003-01-01 Thread Zoltan Gyorgypal
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:45:42 +0100 From: Zoltan Gyorgypal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Windows install fails on 110CT In summary, after a medium period of use, and with no apparent diagnostic problems, currently I can not even install any sort of Windows on it (install programs fail

Re: [LIB] Problem Device

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Hanson
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 23:14:38 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device I've recently had my first experiences with W2K, and found it is really picky about which software it will support properly. I'm looking more seriously at o/c-ing my L100 to 266, and

Re: [LIB] Windows install fails on 110CT

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Hanson
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 23:21:44 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Windows install fails on 110CT From: Zoltan Gyorgypal [EMAIL PROTECTED] well i had a similar problem with my 100ct, it turned out to be a slightly loose ram upgrade, so try to take your ram

Re: [LIB] Problem Device

2003-01-01 Thread Chester Prudhomme
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 16:53:55 -0800 From: Chester Prudhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device Matthew Hanson wrote: Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 23:14:38 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device I've recently had my first experiences with

Re: [LIB] Problem Device

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Hanson
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 02:36:39 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device From: Chester Prudhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt I think you will find that XP is just as picky as W2K about what software it will support. In very general terms - neither has a broad

Re: [LIB] Problem Device

2003-01-01 Thread Chester Prudhomme
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 19:16:13 -0800 From: Chester Prudhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device Matthew Hanson wrote: Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 02:36:39 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device From: Chester Prudhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LIB] Problem Device

2003-01-01 Thread Matthew Hanson
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 05:57:28 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device From: Chester Prudhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED] That is interesting, I have a 4 year old version of PhotoDeluxe installed on my L110 with W2K and I had no problem installing it nor have I

Re: [LIB] Problem Device

2003-01-01 Thread Chester Prudhomme
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 22:33:44 -0800 From: Chester Prudhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device Matthew Hanson wrote: Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 05:57:28 + From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] Problem Device From: Chester Prudhomme [EMAIL PROTECTED]