Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:20:58 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
Matt Hanson wrote:
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:22:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:52:33 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] slow
john wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:51:33 -0600 (GMT+6)
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: slow
thanks for the help in getting my linux install working again on my libby.
Movies now
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:31:19 -0600 (GMT+6)
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] slow
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:52:33 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] slow
john wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:51:33 -0600
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:18:34 +0100
From: Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] slow
john wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:31:19 -0600 (GMT+6)
From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] slow
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:56:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] When EZ-Drive is a must for W98 * W2K installations
--- Philip Nienhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what happened on you Lib is that initially scandisk got confused
because of the 0b setting
