Re: [LIB] cpu cache

2002-05-04 Thread neil barnes

Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 06:50:38 +
From: neil barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 11:20:34 +0800
From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

At 07:55 PM 3/05/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 22:52:39 -0400
From: Gennadiy Tsygan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

Just downloaded and read L100 service manual. It says that write-back 
cache
is faster.

Just download and read the Windows XP manual. It says Windows XP is faster.

Sorry, I just had to slip that in for irony value ;-)



grin I *knew* I was still asleep when I wrote the original comment - I got 
it backwards. Write-back only writes when the cache is flushed so on most 
programs it's quicker.

_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**





Re: [LIB] cpu cache

2002-05-03 Thread Gennadiy Tsygan

Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 22:52:39 -0400
From: Gennadiy Tsygan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

Just downloaded and read L100 service manual. It says that write-back cache
is faster.

- Original Message -
From: neil barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Libretto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache


 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 05:53:53 +
 From: neil barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache


 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:53:20 -0500
 From: John Musielewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: cpu cache
 
 Hi
 
 What is the differance between the write through and write back settings
in
 the bios? I changed mine from write back to write through and now my 70
is
 really moving!!!
 

 Write-back forces a simultaneous write to memory with every write to
cache,
 so there's a ram access delay at every write. Write-through writes to the
 cache but only writes to real memory if the space in the cache is required
 for something else, or the system shuts down, or it's told to. So it's
 usually quicker. (actually, that feels the wrong way round, but it's early
 in the morning)

 I wrote a long screed on what all the bios switches do which should be in
 the archive somewhere and may be helpful.

 _
 MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
 http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




 **
 http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
 http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

  ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
 Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
 addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
 on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
   TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
 Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
 **







**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**





Re: [LIB] cpu cache

2002-05-03 Thread Raymond

Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 11:20:34 +0800
From: Raymond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

At 07:55 PM 3/05/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 22:52:39 -0400
From: Gennadiy Tsygan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

Just downloaded and read L100 service manual. It says that write-back cache
is faster.

Just download and read the Windows XP manual. It says Windows XP is faster.

Sorry, I just had to slip that in for irony value ;-)


- Raymond

---


/~\
| | Does fuzzy logic tickle?|
|   ___   | My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup? |
|  /__/   +---|
| /  \ a y b o t  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| |  HTTP://www.raybot.net|
| ICQ: 31756092   |   Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet!  |
\~/




**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**





Re: [LIB] cpu cache

2002-04-29 Thread Matthew Hanson

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:59:38 +
From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

From: John Musielewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What is the differance between the write through and write back settings in 
the bios? I changed mine from write back to write through and now my 70 is 
really moving!!!

Hmmm... didn't seem to make any difference on my L70/W98 system.  If 
anything, it may have seemed a tad slower.  Another case of 'depends'?

Matt Hanson (Shel)

_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com




**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**





Re: [LIB] cpu cache

2002-04-27 Thread Matthew Hanson

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 06:57:54 +
From: Matthew Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

From: neil barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Write-back forces a simultaneous write to memory with every write to
cache, so there's a ram access delay at every write. Write-through writes to 
the cache but only writes to real memory if the space in the cache is 
required for something else, or the system shuts down, or it's told to. So 
it's usually quicker. (actually, that feels the wrong way round, but it's 
early in the morning)
I wrote a long screed on what all the bios switches do which should
be in the archive somewhere and may be helpful.

For those new to the list, there is a searchable archives that Mike Kopplin 
maintains at: http://www.technoir.nu/libretto/list/

Wish we could convince Dan to include a link to it in the taglines (though 
there may be a few other changes a few of us would like to see down there).

Matt Hanson (Shel)
^A new signature to shorten explainations off-list.


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**





Re: [LIB] cpu cache

2002-04-27 Thread John Musielewicz

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:08:56 -0500
From: John Musielewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache

 For those new to the list, there is a searchable archives that Mike
Kopplin
 maintains at: http://www.technoir.nu/libretto/list/

Thanks Matt. I bookmarked it.

John





**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**





[LIB] cpu cache

2002-04-26 Thread John Musielewicz

Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:53:20 -0500
From: John Musielewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cpu cache

Hi

What is the differance between the write through and write back settings in
the bios? I changed mine from write back to write through and now my 70 is
really moving!!!

John




**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**





Re: [LIB] cpu cache

2002-04-26 Thread neil barnes

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 05:53:53 +
From: neil barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] cpu cache


Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:53:20 -0500
From: John Musielewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cpu cache

Hi

What is the differance between the write through and write back settings in
the bios? I changed mine from write back to write through and now my 70 is
really moving!!!


Write-back forces a simultaneous write to memory with every write to cache, 
so there's a ram access delay at every write. Write-through writes to the 
cache but only writes to real memory if the space in the cache is required 
for something else, or the system shuts down, or it's told to. So it's 
usually quicker. (actually, that feels the wrong way round, but it's early 
in the morning)

I wrote a long screed on what all the bios switches do which should be in 
the archive somewhere and may be helpful.

_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




**
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives

 ---TO UNSUBSCRIBE---
Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be
addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text
on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST--
Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest
**