On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 04:12 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>> On 08/16/2017 03:23 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tyler Hicks
wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 09:57 AM, Paul
On 08/16/2017 04:12 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 08/16/2017 03:23 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
On 08/16/2017 09:57 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tyler Hicks
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 03:23 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>> On 08/16/2017 09:57 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/15/2017 04:14 PM, Paul Moore
On 08/16/2017 03:23 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 08/16/2017 09:57 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
On 08/15/2017 04:14 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tyler Hicks
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 09:57 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>> On 08/15/2017 04:14 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 04:04 PM, Paul Moore
On 08/16/2017 09:57 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 08/15/2017 04:14 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
On 08/14/2017 04:04 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> First, I think some clarification is in order.
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/15/2017 04:14 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>> On 08/14/2017 04:04 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
First, I think some clarification is in order. The only tests that
are executed using the
On 08/15/2017 04:14 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 08/14/2017 04:04 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> First, I think some clarification is in order. The only tests that
>>> are executed using the host kernel's seccomp mechanism are the
>>> tests/*-live-*
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 04:04 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> First, I think some clarification is in order. The only tests that
>> are executed using the host kernel's seccomp mechanism are the
>> tests/*-live-* tests. All of the tests/*-sim-* tests, which a
On 08/14/2017 04:04 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 08/14/2017 03:53 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
I had forgotten about an aspect of this problem. We'll want to test new
return actions in
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 03:53 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>> I had forgotten about an aspect of this problem. We'll want to test new
>>> return actions in the simulated BPF tests but it won't be possible
On 08/14/2017 03:53 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> I had forgotten about an aspect of this problem. We'll want to test new
>> return actions in the simulated BPF tests but it won't be possible
>> because the seccomp(2) syscall will return ENOSYS unde
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> I had forgotten about an aspect of this problem. We'll want to test new
> return actions in the simulated BPF tests but it won't be possible
> because the seccomp(2) syscall will return ENOSYS under valgrind (under
> both old and new kernels).
On 08/10/2017 03:02 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> On 08/10/2017 01:56 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
Hello - I'm working on some libseccomp patches to support new kernel
filter flags (SECCOMP
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 08/10/2017 01:56 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>>> Hello - I'm working on some libseccomp patches to support new kernel
>>> filter flags (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG and maybe
>>> SECCOMP_FILTER_FL
On 08/10/2017 01:56 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> Hello - I'm working on some libseccomp patches to support new kernel
>> filter flags (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG and maybe
>> SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_KILL_PROCESS) and return actions (SECCOMP_RET_LOG)
>> be
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> Hello - I'm working on some libseccomp patches to support new kernel
> filter flags (SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG and maybe
> SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_KILL_PROCESS) and return actions (SECCOMP_RET_LOG)
> being discussed upstream. I've bumped into an issu
17 matches
Mail list logo