condlife
Subject: Re: [libsecondlife-dev] Updated ProtocolManager in svn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Might I be the first to say: Sweet!
>
> Can I infer that someone at LL legally transmitted this protocol
information
> file to you? I daresay we are at risk of losing our label as "reverse
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might I be the first to say: Sweet!
Can I infer that someone at LL legally transmitted this protocol information
file to you? I daresay we are at risk of losing our label as "reverse
engineers"... But that's like saying a man who won the lottery is at risk of
losing soc
Might I be the first to say: Sweet!
Can I infer that someone at LL legally transmitted this protocol information
file to you? I daresay we are at risk of losing our label as "reverse
engineers"... But that's like saying a man who won the lottery is at risk of
losing social security benefits... W