RE: [libsecondlife-dev] Updated ProtocolManager in svn

2006-07-26 Thread Vincent_Samuel
condlife Subject: Re: [libsecondlife-dev] Updated ProtocolManager in svn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Might I be the first to say: Sweet! > > Can I infer that someone at LL legally transmitted this protocol information > file to you? I daresay we are at risk of losing our label as "reverse >

Re: [libsecondlife-dev] Updated ProtocolManager in svn

2006-07-26 Thread John Hurliman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Might I be the first to say: Sweet! Can I infer that someone at LL legally transmitted this protocol information file to you? I daresay we are at risk of losing our label as "reverse engineers"... But that's like saying a man who won the lottery is at risk of losing soc

RE: [libsecondlife-dev] Updated ProtocolManager in svn

2006-07-26 Thread Vincent_Samuel
Might I be the first to say: Sweet! Can I infer that someone at LL legally transmitted this protocol information file to you? I daresay we are at risk of losing our label as "reverse engineers"... But that's like saying a man who won the lottery is at risk of losing social security benefits... W