Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anything in particular I should pay attention to before I just proceed
> with this?
The periodic authentication failure problem is one that will have to be
addressed eventually. Based on Guenter's autobuilds, it seems to happen
on about 1% of connectio
In my opinion, taking in account that many fixes has been provided( some being
really important) it could be a very good idea!
Regards,
Antonio
-- Initial Header ---
>From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : "Mikhail Gusarov" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : "libssh2 hacking"
Bugs item #1826989, was opened at 2007-11-06 17:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bagder
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=703942&aid=1826989&group_id=125852
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Release-making script leaves some CVS files in tarball (win32/CVS and
> win32/test/CVS). Please fix it, so I no longer need to shut up the lintian
> about them.
Ah, I'd forgot about that. Fixed now!
> I'm sorry that I did not follow all the threads:
Bugs item #1826989, was opened at 2007-11-06 16:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tonyspoken
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=703942&aid=1826989&group_id=125852
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anything in particular I should pay attention to before I just proceed
> with this?
Release-making script leaves some CVS files in tarball (win32/CVS and
win32/test/CVS). Please fix it, so I no longer need to shut up the
lintian about them.
I'm sorry
Hello friends!
I want to release a 0.18 now since we've fixed a few bugs (that hurt people)
since 0.17.
Anything in particular I should pay attention to before I just proceed with
this?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Bugs item #1826989, was opened at 2007-11-06 17:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bagder
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=703942&aid=1826989&group_id=125852
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Gavrie Philipson wrote:
> The problem is that in nonblocking mode, the TCP window size adjustments
> from the other size are sometimes not received, causing the local window
> size to remain at zero.
Many thanks, I edited out that chunk of code and inserted a huge comment bl
Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Anyway, since these changes didn't fix the problem you see we should rather
> dive in and start debugging your case I guess. I'm a bit limited on time
> myself why I haven't made much sound about this issue so far. My time limit
> makes me focus on
10 matches
Mail list logo
