Hey
I'd like to suggest that we add a libssh2_version() function that returns
information about the lib. I just noticed how debian unstable got a fresh
libssh2 1.0, but curl is still thinking it is 0.18 since it got the version
number at build-time instead of run-time.
So I would like to see a
Daniel Stenberg writes:
> Hey
>
> I'd like to suggest that we add a libssh2_version() function that returns
> information about the lib. I just noticed how debian unstable got a fresh
> libssh2 1.0, but curl is still thinking it is 0.18 since it got the version
> number at build-time instead o
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:08, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Do we need to use a struct here? If we ever need to change the struct
> (which may happen if we support some other TLS library or some other
> compression, or similar), it seems we'd need to bump the ABI of the
> library?
>
> How about some
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> const char *libssh2_check_version (int req_version_num);
>
> Which could be used by applications like this:
>
> if (!libssh2_check_version (LIBSSH2_VERSION_NUM)) {
> fprintf (stderr, "Runtime libssh2 version too old!\n");
> exit(1);
> }
Right, that'
Hi friends,
Can anyone who actually uses mingw to build libssh2 help me out with some
feedback on this. I know we've poked a bit on these files lately, so I don't
like to just blindly commit this contributed patch and I just don't have any
windows setup nearby to test it on.
So please tell me:
Daniel Stenberg writes:
> Hi friends,
>
> Can anyone who actually uses mingw to build libssh2 help me out with some
> feedback on this. I know we've poked a bit on these files lately, so I don't
> like to just blindly commit this contributed patch and I just don't have any
> windows setup near
Daniel Stenberg writes:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>> const char *libssh2_check_version (int req_version_num);
>>
>> Which could be used by applications like this:
>>
>> if (!libssh2_check_version (LIBSSH2_VERSION_NUM)) {
>> fprintf (stderr, "Runtime libssh2 version too old!
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Yup. Or just skip the 'extra' parameter completely. People who care about
> that kind of details can run ldd on the application or library, can't they?
You're right. I ditched it and committed an intial version just now together
with a man page fo
