Daniel Stenberg writes:
> On Mon, 4 May 2009, J.T. Conklin wrote:
>
>>> A read the known_hosts file(s) and keep a set of hosts/key pair in memory
>>> B compare a host/key with the known set to see if it exists and if so if
>>> it
>>> matches the key
>>> C add/replace a host key/key in
fantastic, looks like it works beautifully. much appreciated, very
happy to have this fixed so I can move to using 1.1 instead of the
archaic 0.13 I was using :)
--
Jeremy Knope / Software Developer / Ambrosia Software, Inc. --
http://www.AmbrosiaSW.com/
On May 1, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Danie
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> That sounds good. I think it is important that the APIs doesn't become
> OpenSSH specific.
Maybe take a look at what PuTTY does. It is portable across Windows
and UNIX and uses the registry on Windows, but something else on
UNIX.
//Peter
---
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> That sounds good. I think it is important that the APIs doesn't become
> OpenSSH specific. It is still important to support OpenSSH-style files,
> because they are common and easily testable. The OpenSSH support should
> probably be done by auxill
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Jeremy Knope wrote:
> fantastic, looks like it works beautifully. much appreciated, very happy to
> have this fixed so I can move to using 1.1 instead of the archaic 0.13 I was
> using :)
Great! I trust you mean you move to the current CVS HEAD or the upcoming 1.2?
As 1.1
yes I do mean that, I'm on the CVS HEAD version now and will probably
switch to 1.2 once it's out. Thanks! Works great.
--
Jeremy Knope / Software Developer / Ambrosia Software, Inc. --
http://www.AmbrosiaSW.com/
On May 5, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2009, Je
> Great! I trust you mean you move to the current CVS HEAD or the
> upcoming 1.2?
> As 1.1 did have the problems this thread is about...
>
Do we have a date or content list for the 1.2 milestone?
Neil
--
The NEW KODAK
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Neil Gierman wrote:
> Do we have a date or content list for the 1.2 milestone?
Not really.
I hope to get some hostkey work done within the nearest future (month?) and
once that seems to work good enough I'll try to get a 1.2 release out. As I
want to use this functionality
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:12:01PM +0200, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> After 1.2, I'm thinking perhaps time has come for a SONAME bump so that we
> can
> cut out 6 functions and get some further cleanups done...
A SONAME bump is so destructive, I hope the cleanups are worthwhile. IMHO,
it shouldn't
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Dan Fandrich wrote:
> A SONAME bump is so destructive, I hope the cleanups are worthwhile. IMHO,
> it shouldn't be done solely to remove functions; it doesn't take much to
> leave them in and mark them as deprecated. Unless they're so broken that
> it's to force users to fix
10 matches
Mail list logo
