On Mar 29, 2001, Nick Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am suggesting that libtool adopt the principle of least surprises
and make name.la -module produce name.so wherever possible.
Is this unreasonable?
Nope. The only point in discussion is whether this is possible on
NetBSD. We have two
Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to release
libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a feature freeze in HEAD
so that we can shake the bugs out and release 1.4 a week or two later.
Is that okay with everyone?
Then we can finally get on with the messy
On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to release
libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a feature freeze in HEAD
so that we can shake the bugs out and release 1.4 a week or two later.
Is
On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to
release libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a feature
freeze in HEAD so that we can shake
I was wondering what the status is for supporting C++ on Win32 in the
multi-language branch of libtool. In particular I would like to know how
possible it is to build a shared library (dll) with the Win32 version of
Gcc (either, cygwin or mingw). I also need ltdl to work properly under Win32
On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove
duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4.
Huh? Seems like I'm missing something here. What is this bug
