?? libtool 1.4 bug

2001-06-08 Thread Danny Backx
I sent the message below to bug-libtool about a week ago, no reply. Does anyone have solutions, answers, ... ? Danny -- Forwarded by Danny Backx/U27113/KB/KredAlm on 06/08/2001 11:55 AM --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/02/2001 07:30:00 PM To:

Re: [marcelo.magallon@bigfoot.com: Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: libtool]

2001-06-08 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:30:22PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: : needs a way to be able to set the soname. Yes, this is bad in general. : It defeats the whole purpose of libtool, but the problem is that Mesa : is providing another version of an existing library. I can imagine : things

Enabling/disabling shared or static libs from Makefile.am

2001-06-08 Thread Pierre Sarrazin
I am autoconfiscating a large source tree with Autoconf (2.13), Automake (1.4) and Libtool (1.3.5) on a GNU/Linux system. In this tree, there are subtrees that constitute the sources for shared libraries. Other subtrees should give static libraries because they will never be needed in shared

Re: Enabling/disabling shared or static libs from Makefile.am

2001-06-08 Thread Tom Tromey
Pierre == Pierre Sarrazin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pierre Logically, it is in a Makefile.am file that I would like to Pierre ask that a specific library should be static. If you are trying to build a static library, then simply don't use libtool for that library. Write `lib_LIBRARIES'

Re: dll installation logic

2001-06-08 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Since we are trying to make things work like UNIX here, I think that the dlls should probably be installed to $libdir. The problem that needs solving is how to teach the executable to find its dlls. Unfortunately this probably comes dow to wrapper scripts, which is ugly too =(O| Bah!