Re: [ 100058 ] 1.4 - $buildir-path may not contain "~"

2001-06-16 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Bruce! > > In the mean while, I think the only workaround is to not use '~' in pathnames. Let's not hide the problems. Libtool it misusing IFS. Several macros in libtool.m4 set IFS to whatever they want and then run a loop including Autoconf macros assuming that the later can work with an

Re: [ 100058 ] 1.4 - $buildir-path may not contain "~"

2001-06-16 Thread Bruce Korb
"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > ... you have to bear in mind that the libtool source code goes > through m4, sed and bourne shell, as well as having an autoconf pass to > subsitute configure time vars, so the quoting is hairy and sensitive to > change. Meta characters to sed, m4, autoconf or any shel

Re: [ 100058 ] 1.4 - $buildir-path may not contain "~"

2001-06-16 Thread Guido Draheim
> Perhaps the problem will go away when we have a binary ltmain in a couple of > releases? > > In the mean while, I think the only workaround is to not use '~' in pathnames. *sigh* ... actually, I just wonder why it did work in 1.3.x and it must be left as is in 1.4 - well, then again,

[ 100058 ] 1.4 - $buildir-path may not contain "~"

2001-06-16 Thread nobody
Support Request #100058, was updated on 2001-Jun-13 23:10 You can respond by visiting: http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=100058&group_id=25 Category: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Summary: 1.4 - $buildir-path may not contain "~" By: guidod Date: 2001-Jun-16 10:15 M

Re: [ 100058 ] 1.4 - $buildir-path may not contain "~"

2001-06-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Your analysis is correct. Unfortunately, libtool needs to execute multi-line commands which may contain for loops or if statements, and so setting IFS to ';' breaks. Conceivably we could teach libtool more about parsing shell code, but it is already far too slow for that to be a practical sol

Re: Fortran support in multi-language branch?

2001-06-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Friday 15 June 2001 6:00 pm, Robert Boehne wrote: > Erik Lindahl wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > We are libtoolizing our fairly large scientific software package. > > > > Since fortran is still significantly faster than c on most architectures > > we use f77 for the innerloops and link it with c