libltdl and Guile

2002-10-26 Thread Marius Vollmer
Hi, Guile uses libtldl to do its dynamic linking and we decided to ship our own copy of it (suitably renamed) since we found that libltdl contained some showstopper bugs and we wanted be able to fix them quickly without having to wait for a libtool releases and also to be sure that people use the

Re: Deprecate AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL?

2002-10-26 Thread Charles Wilson
Earnie Boyd wrote: Is it still true that global variables exported from a dll must have a dllimport directive for applications? AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL would perhaps indicate a package has addressed this issue (by whatever means) and is therefore dll safe. While this is required by MSVC, to my

Re: Deprecate AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL?

2002-10-26 Thread Charles Wilson
Oops. Looks like the uuencoded version of egor's stuff got scrambled. I've MIME-atteched them here. --Chuck egor-patches-example.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data long_long_example.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data

Re: Deprecate AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL?

2002-10-26 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
This is good info, however, the more pressing matter is that I don't see any evidence that AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL currently supports a flag which determines if DLLs will built. There is the variable lt_cv_cc_dll_switch but this is not used at all by Cygwin anymore, and MinGW only uses it as a means

Re: Deprecate AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL?

2002-10-26 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
IMO, libtool should simply try and build the dll. If dll's need to be disabled, let the author do that via configure.in. What means is provided to absolutely disable building DLLs (without disabling building shared libraries in general) via configure.in? Bob