Oh, to the ode of creating new worms...
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 07:26:20PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Updating to any later version of Libtool is the same amount of work,
whether it be the Debian-patched version or not. Most of the time, when
build failures occur,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 08:04:55PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Or an even better one, just from build failures in the last few days ...
upstream placing the contents of libtool.m4 in acinclude.m4, so even
after aclocal runs the old version is still used.
One thing about maintaining a
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
Assigning copyright and being given CVS access is not necessarily related:
For any substantial updates, copyright is certainly the driving issue.
- If you send too many patches for review without having CVS access, then you
might consider
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 10:17:34AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
- If you send too many patches for review without having CVS access, then you
might consider assigning copyright so that you can send more patches for
review.
The FSF guidelines specify allow to 14 lines of *total*
Hello.
Matthew Arnison wrote:
libtool appears to depend on Unix find. Under Cygwin, an incorrect path can
cause the Windows FIND to be used instead. To the untrained eye, (that is,
me two days ago) it's not obvious from the output of configure and libtool
that this has happened. The only
Dear e-gold account owner!
This message was sent to your mailbo
because you have an active account. At the end
of each month due to our database's maintenance
you need to confirm your account's information.
To do this please click on the following link to
get to the e-gold secure page and
Hi!
I just noticed that with latest Gary's commit running the bootstrap script
from libtool CVS HEAD now requires automake 1.8 and autoconf 2.58.
As I already commented on this list, I'm going through the task of testing
libtool on a variety of CPUs and asking the Debian port maintainers for
