* Jacob Meuser wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 01:07:20AM CET:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:00:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 11:15 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:02:55PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > > Actually, I'd say the opp
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Jacob Meuser wrote:
curious also what's in ../utils/libopenhpiutils.la
probably
installed=yes
and
libdir='/home/sdague/openhpi/openhpi-1.9.3/_inst/lib'
but
/home/sdague/openhpi/openhpi-1.9.3/_inst/lib/libopenhpiutils.so
doesn't yet exist?
If this is the case then this means tha
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:59:08PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> Bob,
>
> The following log is still valid for where the breakdown occurs:
> http://dague.net/libtool.txt.
>
> That is a complete build log, plus all versions of the software.
>
> The problem comes at:
>
> /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs
Bob,
The following log is still valid for where the breakdown occurs:
http://dague.net/libtool.txt.
That is a complete build log, plus all versions of the software.
The problem comes at:
/bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs
/home/sdague/tmp/am-dc-28498//home/sdague/openhpi/openhpi-1.9.3/_inst/lib
/bin/
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:00:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 11:15 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:02:55PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > Actually, I'd say the opposite is true ... the LONGER link line,
> > > produced by the curr
I just was able to get a debian system up to basically the same revision
levels of autotools as my desktop system an it gets through make
distcheck. Which means it isn't a libtool issue, but I'm still hoping
someone might still be able to help me figure out what part of the toolchain
is to bla
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 11:15 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:02:55PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > Actually, I'd say the opposite is true ... the LONGER link line,
> > produced by the current Libtool, is what allows people to get away with
> > this because Libtool pu
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:00:28PM CET:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:06PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 a
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:24:21PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Agreed, making that change now
> >
> > > second you should link to $(srcdir)/relpath/$@ instead
> >
> > Also agreed, making that change now
>
> Watch out. You link to some built sources and some non-built sources.
> When tryi
* Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:00:28PM CET:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:06PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:45:10PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > > It does assume that
VlCODlN and other inexpnsive medlcations - N0 PRESCRlPTION REQUIRED
0RDER NOW and get SHlPPING AT N0
C0ST...
By far the cheapst deals ever seen:
V1AGRA from $64
VAL1UM from $70
AMB1EN from $60
C1AL1S from $98
+ M0RE..
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL
VlCODIN and other inexpnsive medlcations - NO PRESCRlPTl0N REQUlRED
0RDER N0W and get SHlPPlNG AT N0
C0ST...
By far the cheapst dea1s ever seen:
VlAGRA from $61
VAL1UM from $70
AMBlEN from $61
ClAL1S from $99
+ MORE..
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:02:55PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 17:19 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > >> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Doesn't this patch cause Linux to be more equal than other operating
> >
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:06PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:45:10PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > It does assume that all library dependencies are registered, yes. This
> > > has never bee
[ slightly reordered your answers for ease of consistent answers ]
* Sean Dague wrote on Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:56:11PM CET:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:20:05PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Sean Dague wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:45:40PM CET:
> > > The issue I reported a couple weeks
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@i®ïÐIIj
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]@090-8502-8857
(BóMðÛ·éêÍ»Ì|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BóMðÛ·éêÍ»Ì|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BÈPðy[Whttp://www.psend.com/users/unsubdvd/ÜÅ
(B[EMAIL
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:20:05PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Sean Dague wrote on Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:45:40PM CET:
> > The issue I reported a couple weeks ago is still there. We have now tracked
> > down based on a number of versions of libtool to figure out what works and
> > what does
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:45:10PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > It does assume that all library dependencies are registered, yes. This
> > has never been a problem, because we've never found any Libtool-produced
> > library that do
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 17:19 -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Doesn't this patch cause Linux to be more equal than other operating
> >>> systems, thereby causing free applications to be developed which won't
> >>> w
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:34:49PM CET:
>
> >+2004-03-28 Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >+
> >+* ltmain.in: The dynamic link loader on some platforms is able to
> >+correctly traverse dependency trees, therefore when $link_all_deplibs
> >+is set to
20 matches
Mail list logo
