Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:01:31PM CEST:
Here is a revised patch. I changed the recognition of the Sun compilers,
and the whole_archive_flag_spec and postdeps, so that now all 112 tests PASS.
Cool.
With this patch, the FAILs are turned into PASS; all tests
Hi Jean-Yves,
Sorry for the delay.
* Jean-Yves Lefort wrote on Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:54:15PM CEST:
Hi, could you please commit the attached patch (for branch-1-5)? It
fixes shared library versioning on FreeBSD.
Could you point me to the FreeBSD specific change that prompts this?
I looked
On Wed, 10 May 2006 18:15:37 +0200
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jean-Yves,
Sorry for the delay.
* Jean-Yves Lefort wrote on Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:54:15PM CEST:
Hi, could you please commit the attached patch (for branch-1-5)? It
fixes shared library versioning on
Hi,
I encountered a problem while trying to build a softwarepackage (JRTPLib
[1]) which uses libtool on FreeBSD 6.0. The library path (-L /usr/local/lib)
added on the libtool commandline, seems to be removed and not passed on
to GCC. I will try with more recent versions, but I did not find
Hi Panagiotis,
* Panagiotis Issaris wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:05:50PM CEST:
I encountered a problem while trying to build a softwarepackage (JRTPLib
[1]) which uses libtool on FreeBSD 6.0. The library path (-L /usr/local/lib)
added on the libtool commandline, seems to be removed and
Hello Ralf,
Here is a revised patch. I changed the recognition of the Sun compilers,
and the whole_archive_flag_spec and postdeps, so that now all 112 tests PASS.
With this patch, the FAILs are turned into PASS; all tests PASS or SKIP.
Which ones skip?
Good question. I had many SKIPs, but
Hi,
Please ignore. The space between the -L and the /usr/local/lib was
the culprit.
With friendly regards,
Takis
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- there was actually a regression in 1.5.22 over 1.5.20 which caused
some paths to be incorrectly removed on FreeBSD and some other BSD
variants. Has since been fixed in CVS branch-1-5 (and HEAD).
Is there likely to be a 1.5.24
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:08PM CEST:
On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- there was actually a regression in 1.5.22 over 1.5.20 which caused
some paths to be incorrectly removed on FreeBSD and some other BSD
variants. Has since been
From: Christian Biesinger
It seems to me that this is a bug in any case. Not only is
-version-number inconsistent with -version-info here. Even if BeOS has a
versioning system for libraries and libtool gets support for that, this
would still leave -version-number broken for other platforms
10 matches
Mail list logo