Re: support for SunPRO C/C++ on Linux

2006-05-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:01:31PM CEST: Here is a revised patch. I changed the recognition of the Sun compilers, and the whole_archive_flag_spec and postdeps, so that now all 112 tests PASS. Cool. With this patch, the FAILs are turned into PASS; all tests

Re: patch fixing FreeBSD shlib versioning

2006-05-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jean-Yves, Sorry for the delay. * Jean-Yves Lefort wrote on Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:54:15PM CEST: Hi, could you please commit the attached patch (for branch-1-5)? It fixes shared library versioning on FreeBSD. Could you point me to the FreeBSD specific change that prompts this? I looked

Re: patch fixing FreeBSD shlib versioning

2006-05-10 Thread Jean-Yves Lefort
On Wed, 10 May 2006 18:15:37 +0200 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jean-Yves, Sorry for the delay. * Jean-Yves Lefort wrote on Fri, May 05, 2006 at 09:54:15PM CEST: Hi, could you please commit the attached patch (for branch-1-5)? It fixes shared library versioning on

Libtool apparantly removing path parameters on FreeBSD

2006-05-10 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi, I encountered a problem while trying to build a softwarepackage (JRTPLib [1]) which uses libtool on FreeBSD 6.0. The library path (-L /usr/local/lib) added on the libtool commandline, seems to be removed and not passed on to GCC. I will try with more recent versions, but I did not find

Re: Libtool apparantly removing path parameters on FreeBSD

2006-05-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Panagiotis, * Panagiotis Issaris wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:05:50PM CEST: I encountered a problem while trying to build a softwarepackage (JRTPLib [1]) which uses libtool on FreeBSD 6.0. The library path (-L /usr/local/lib) added on the libtool commandline, seems to be removed and

Re: support for SunPRO C/C++ on Linux

2006-05-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Ralf, Here is a revised patch. I changed the recognition of the Sun compilers, and the whole_archive_flag_spec and postdeps, so that now all 112 tests PASS. With this patch, the FAILs are turned into PASS; all tests PASS or SKIP. Which ones skip? Good question. I had many SKIPs, but

Re: Libtool apparantly removing path parameters on FreeBSD

2006-05-10 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi, Please ignore. The space between the -L and the /usr/local/lib was the culprit. With friendly regards, Takis ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Libtool apparantly removing path parameters on FreeBSD

2006-05-10 Thread Olly Betts
On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - there was actually a regression in 1.5.22 over 1.5.20 which caused some paths to be incorrectly removed on FreeBSD and some other BSD variants. Has since been fixed in CVS branch-1-5 (and HEAD). Is there likely to be a 1.5.24

Libtool release plan (was: Libtool apparantly removing path parameters on FreeBSD)

2006-05-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Olly, * Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:08PM CEST: On 2006-05-10, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - there was actually a regression in 1.5.22 over 1.5.20 which caused some paths to be incorrectly removed on FreeBSD and some other BSD variants. Has since been

RE: [png-mng-implement] -version-number and BeOS

2006-05-10 Thread Nicolas Mendoza
From: Christian Biesinger It seems to me that this is a bug in any case. Not only is -version-number inconsistent with -version-info here. Even if BeOS has a versioning system for libraries and libtool gets support for that, this would still leave -version-number broken for other platforms