libtool ChangeLog libltdl/m4/libtool.m4

2008-03-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
CVSROOT:/sources/libtool Module name:libtool Changes by: Peter O'Gorman pogma 08/03/27 17:53:46 Modified files: . : ChangeLog libltdl/m4 : libtool.m4 Log message: * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 [_LT_REQUIRED_DARWIN_CHECKS]: Fix the

Re: libtool 1.5.26: link fails on Darwin 5.5 because of wrong detection of -single_module flag support

2008-03-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:56:17AM CET: Ok? Yes, with nits below addressed. Thanks, Ralf 2008-03-26 Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 [_LT_REQUIRED_DARWIN_CHECKS]: Fix the test for -single_module and log it to

Re: Customizing soname

2008-03-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Hello, I had an issue that I solved in patching libtool, I am not sure this was the right thing to do, but if it was, I think it should go into libtool. I require to produce a shared library that whose name is customizable by the user. Why? I can understand wanting to

Re: Customizing soname

2008-03-27 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/27/08, Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why? I can understand wanting to change the extension, we have -shrext for that. But why do you want the user to have the option to set the name? Hi! Because I generate a plugin, each configuration results in different plugin. I also have

Re: Customizing soname

2008-03-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 3/27/08, Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why? I can understand wanting to change the extension, we have -shrext for that. But why do you want the user to have the option to set the name? Hi! Because I generate a plugin, each configuration results in

Re: Customizing soname

2008-03-27 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/27/08, Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does automake complain if you do something like: @PLUGIN_TARGET@: foo.lo $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link --tag=CC $(CCLD) -o @PLUGIN_TARGET@ \ foo.lo -avoid-version -module install-exec-hook: @PLUGIN_TARGET@ $(LIBTOOL)

Re: MinGW linux to win32 cross compiler and the test suite

2008-03-27 Thread Roumen Petrov
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Hi all, I have the beginnings of a solution to this issue. If I hack the libtool generated wrapper script and replace this: exec $progdir/$program ${1+$@} with WINEDLLPATH=$PATH;$WINEDLLPATH exec wine $progdir/$program ${1+$@} My test suite

Re: Customizing soname

2008-03-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Alon Bar-Lev wrote on Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:35:48PM CET: On 3/27/08, Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why? I can understand wanting to change the extension, we have -shrext for that. But why do you want the user to have the option to set the name? Because I generate a plugin,

Re: Customizing soname

2008-03-27 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/28/08, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the set of possible names limited? If yes, please read http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Conditional-Libtool-Libraries.html Hi, No... Sorry... I need to produce a different name chosen by configure and/or user. But

Re: Customizing soname

2008-03-27 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 3/28/08, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the set of possible names limited? If yes, please read http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Conditional-Libtool-Libraries.html Hi, No... Sorry... I need to produce a different name chosen by