* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:39:56AM CET:
On Sunday 2008-11-02 21:56, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:24:27PM CET:
I have two libraries in paths that are not searched by default (e.g.
/opt/foo/lib). So I have this in my
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dan,
* Dan Nicholson wrote on Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 09:48:28PM CET:
Add an option, --no-la-files, which skips installing the .la files. When
used with --mode=uninstall, libtool tries to use the .lai file from the
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:31AM CET:
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:39:56AM CET:
Is not that what libtool is supposed to cover up? Maybe not for every
make invocation à la `make LD=zzzld`, but perhaps determining the
type of ld at
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dan,
* Dan Nicholson wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:17:53PM CET:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Dan Nicholson wrote on Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 09:48:28PM CET:
Add an
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Oh, well. You do know that all the linux distros (that I know of)
remove the .la files, right?
NO
I was sort of hoping there would be a
nice way to do that.
Check content of so called
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Roumen Petrov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[SNIP]
Oh, well. You do know that all the linux distros (that I know of)
remove the .la files, right?
NO
Looks like I
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 07:58:36AM CET:
So I guess the reasons why distros remove the .la files is because
they are within the default search paths.
Yes; and because some versions of libtool did the wrong thing wrt.
multi-ABI systems like x86_64. (BTW if there are
I would like to build and install several revisions of a large system
(hours to compile on slower machines).
My hope was to build the project in a central location so unchanged files
wouldn't need to recompile, and then have libtool relink everything and
fix the RPATHs during install. This
* Dan Nicholson wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:17:57PM CET:
P.S. Why do you keep setting the reply-to on your emails to me? I try
to reply to your messages and end up sending them to myself.
I don't set Reply-To: at all. My mail program (mutt) sets
Mail-Followup-To: to the list address and
On Monday 2008-11-03 22:59, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:14:31AM CET:
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 07:39:56AM CET:
Is not that what libtool is supposed to cover up? Maybe not for every
make invocation à la `make LD=zzzld`, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
