On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Andy Wingo <wi...@oblong.net> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Tue 23 Dec 2008 19:25, "Dan Nicholson" <dbn.li...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Andy Wingo <wi...@oblong.net> wrote: >>> >>> Unpack the attached tarball (it will create its own directory). It is a >>> standard autotooled project with one file, foo.c. >>> >>> Expected results: ./autogen.sh && make produces a .so file in .libs. >> >> If you create a noinst libtool library, it will be static. Change to >> lib_LTLIBRARIES or whatever. > > How do I then create an .so for a test suite? check_LTLIBRARIES doesn't > do it either. > > I do not want to install this module.
Did it used to work that a noinst library compiled with -module would give you a shared library? I've never tried to do that before. Crap, I just realized that I forgot to cc: libtool and this got off list. -- Dan _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool