On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 07:15:50PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
I'm building a program that links against boost with libtool.
The boost library is installed on the system and is a shared library.
When i run my program ./test_suite I get,
$ ./test_suite
.../build/.libs/lt-test_suite: error
Hi,
I'm building a program that links against boost with libtool.
The boost library is installed on the system and is a shared library.
When i run my program ./test_suite I get,
$ ./test_suite
.../build/.libs/lt-test_suite: error while loading shared libraries:
libboost_filesystem.so.1.53.0:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Bob,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:18:56PM CET:
plugindir = $(libdir)/plugins
plugin_LTLIBRARIES =
plugin_LTLIBRARIES
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 10:32:53AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 05:36:48PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Bob,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:18:56PM CET:
plugindir = $(libdir
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Bob,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:18:56PM CET:
plugindir = $(libdir)/plugins
plugin_LTLIBRARIES =
plugin_LTLIBRARIES += libfoo.la
libfoo_la_SOURCES = foo.cc
libfoo_la_LDFLAGS
Hi,
This question has been asked before, here,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2004-12/msg00308.html
with no response apparently.
Is it possible to create a noinst shared library?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
, thanks!
Thank you Ralf. I owe you one.
Bob Rossi
normal DLLs.
I tried this. I never did get it to work. Perhaps I should try libtool
CVS? Have any changes been made recently?
I could post more details if you suspect this should work.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
is a
common (and logical) expectation for people. i'm not saying this is grounds
for this must be done!, just putting it out there.
Exactly, I would think most people would not expect the current
behavior. I would say Hey, I told make to be quit, but it's not.
Ingorance is bliss.
Bob Rossi
libtool, some g++ commands started to appear. I thought it would seem
natural that the -s to the Makefile would be supported by the libtool
generated Makefile code.
It was just my This is how things should intuitively work reaction.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
is a
common (and logical) expectation for people. i'm not saying this is grounds
for this must be done!, just putting it out there.
Exactly, I would think most people would not expect the current
behavior. I would say Hey, I told make to be quit, but it's not.
Ingorance is bliss.
Bob Rossi
ideas?
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
request. Thanks again for libtool.
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
/libfoo.so
on windows, I get install/lib/bin/libfoo-0.dll
Any idea why the dll isn't going into the plugins dir and why
it is going into lib/bin?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Bob,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:18:56PM CET:
plugindir = $(libdir)/plugins
plugin_LTLIBRARIES =
plugin_LTLIBRARIES += libfoo.la
libfoo_la_SOURCES = foo.cc
libfoo_la_LDFLAGS
Hi,
This may be a silly question, but I couldn't find the answer quickly.
Is it possible to only build and install shared libraries for a
particular directory? I don't want to waste time building and installing
static libraries, considering these library are used by dlopen.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 11:32:07AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Bob,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:34:57PM CEST:
What I want to do is this:
PLUGINS = plugin1 plugin2
lib_LTLIBRARIES += $(patsubst %, lib%.la, $(PLUGINS))
$(patsubst %, lib%_la_SOURCES
?
Thanks!
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:04:12AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Bob, Max, all,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:26:25AM CEST:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Is there any way that I can have libtool simply create a dll with the
new
an easy way to make libtool just output
the name of the dll with out the -number.
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:18:31AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
Bob Rossi wrote:
Yup, I think this is the topic that I've been asking about. Not that I
don't like it, but some of the users of a library I help maintain don't
like it. I don't seem to have an easy way to make libtool just
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Bob Rossi wrote:
I've recently converted pcre's (http://www.pcre.org/) build
system to use the autotools.
The previous stable version of libtool, pcre-7.0, used
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Bob Rossi wrote:
I've recently converted pcre's (http://www.pcre.org/) build
system to use the autotools.
The previous stable version of libtool, pcre-7.0, used to create dll's
on mingw. It would create
$ ls .libs/*.dll
would be an appropriate response to this user?
Finally, here is the version numbering in configure.ac,
m4_define(libpcre_version, [0:1:0])
m4_define(libpcreposix_version, [0:0:0])
m4_define(libpcrecpp_version, [0:0:0])
not sure if that's good or not.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:05:28AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:38 -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a Makefile.am file for a library. When I do make, the
foo-config is in the build directory. However, when I do 'make install'
it doesn't go into the bin
Hi,
How do I build a program before a library with automake and libtool?
By default, the library is being built first and that is not what I
want.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Hi,
I'm writing a Makefile.am file for a library. When I do make, the
foo-config is in the build directory. However, when I do 'make install'
it doesn't go into the bin directory. Any idea how to force it to?
Reading the documentation for libtool and automake didn't seem to help.
Thanks,
Bob
-pcre_version.o libpcre_la-pcre_xclass.o
ranlib .libs/libpcre.a
creating libpcre.la
Does anyone understand why I'd be getting these errors? Are .def files
important for static windows libraries or only for dll's? Any advice?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http
the declspec's
alltogether from the header file? That will work for both dynamic and
static setup?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:42:36AM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:30:19PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
The next question is, why is it looking for an import symbol instead of
using the real symbol. The answer to that must lie in your header files;
they probably declare
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Bob Rossi wrote on Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:35:35PM CET:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
is the -enable-experimental-libtool something this list endorses?
FWIW, I have no idea what
?
BTW, OUCH, I just realized I configured with the wrong parameter,
-enable-experimental-libtool should have been --enable-experimental-libtool.
Yet another obvious reason the autoconf people should modify ./configure
to warn about parameters.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
- Forwarded message from Bob Rossi
-config apu-config.out
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bobbybrasko/log4cxx/apr-util/src/apr-util'
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:35:35PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 07:11:08PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
What exactly can I do about the libtool warning messages?
These?
Yup,
*** Warning: This system can not link to static lib archive
/home/bobbybrasko
libexpat.a libexpat.dll.a libexpat.la
My package is not using libtool. Can I link to the expat library? Or do
I also need to use libtool?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http
.
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
to libtool.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:34:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have
noinst_bin_PROGRAMS = gdbmi_driver
noinst_bindir = $(top_builddir)/progs
Try using $(abs_top_builddir) instead. I've always had bad luck with
relative paths and anything
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:05:57PM +, Olly Betts wrote:
On 2006-04-30, Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunatly, that doesn't work either.
test -z /progs || mkdir -p -- /progs
mkdir: cannot create directory `/progs': Permission denied
abs_top_builddir isn't set
/gdbmi/builddir/src'
make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bob/cvs/gdbmi/builddir/src'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
Attached is the configure.in and Makefile.am file. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure
40 matches
Mail list logo
