Hi Keith, others,
Sorry for the response latency. This is a status update for the -sobase
patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-07/msg00093.html.
* Keith Packard wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:55:47PM CEST:
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:13 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Keith, others,
Sorry for the response latency. This is a status update for the -sobase
patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-07/msg00093.html.
Thanks for your response and your work on this matter.
Your patch
Hi Keith,
* Keith Packard wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:42:57PM CEST:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:23 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Now I'm wondering whether it would make sense to add a switch to libtool
that makes it not install those two things, such as -old-abi.
I have to support two
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Re-reading this thread, I would be inclined to accept a patch which
implements your original proposal, given that a way can be found how it
degrades gracefully on the different/not-so-flexible shared library
systems mentioned. That
Hi Keith,
* Keith Packard wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 06:59:10AM CEST:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:24 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
But libXaw.so.major_number is the default behaviour for libtool. Are you
using -release instead of -version-info or -version-number? I think
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:24 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
But libXaw.so.major_number is the default behaviour for libtool. Are you
using -release instead of -version-info or -version-number? I think
-version-number will give you exactly
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 08:31 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
First, to stay with your GNU/Linux example, unless you also have
libXaw.so.6 as symlink, how will ld.so find your library (as installed
library; or alternatively as user-installed test version below $HOME)?
The current ELF shared
Russ == Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't know this. But trying to make -version-info get the SONAME you
need is an abuse of libtool in any case. I think -version-number option
available in recent versions of libtool is perfect for
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, I haven't. I have little experience with these systems, so I don't
even know if this scheme will work. Hence my question to this list where
I imagine there are people with experience on those systems. The key
question is whether the system
Hi,
Keith Packard wrote:
I want the SONAME to be libXaw.so.6, but the filename to be libXaw6.la,
libXaw6.so.6.0.1, libXaw6.so.6 and libXaw6.so
There is no need to name the real file libXaw6.so.6.0.1, as the 6 is
mentioned twice this way (libXaw.so.6.0.1 suffices). The unversioned
symlink and
Hi Keith,
* Keith Packard wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:47:37AM CEST:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 08:31 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
First, to stay with your GNU/Linux example, unless you also have
libXaw.so.6 as symlink, how will ld.so find your library (as installed
library; or
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:15:53PM CEST:
Keith, could you confirm that this would be enough for your needs, when
given as install mode switch? Current idea would be to have it install
the first name from library_names only, do not delete the symlinks nor
s/the first
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 14:10 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, I haven't. I have little experience with these systems, so I don't
even know if this scheme will work. Hence my question to this list where
I imagine there are people with
to make sure I create the links
at install time. Of course, if we do hack libtool to support alternate
SONAME values, we could also hack it to manage these symlinks for us.
-keith
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
http
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 16:15 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Keith, could you confirm that this would be enough for your needs, when
given as install mode switch? Current idea would be to have it install
the first name from library_names only, do not delete the symlinks nor
create new ones, do
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 11:23 +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
Now I'm wondering whether it would make sense to add a switch to libtool
that makes it not install those two things, such as -old-abi.
I have to support two of these library versions as 'current' for other
reasons, so applications need to
I'm building a weird set of libraries and would like libtool to help out
a bit by providing some mechanism to modify the SONAME placed into
the .so file.
X has three versions of the Xaw library; version 6, 7 and 8
(cooresponding to the .so major version numbers, which are the same
across all
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
the versioned filename varients:
Version 6 Xaw - libXaw6.so.6.0.1 SONAME=libXaw.so.6
Version 7 Xaw - libXaw7.so.7.0.0 SONAME=libXaw.so.7
Version 8 Xaw - libXaw8.so.8.0.0
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:53:17PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
the versioned filename varients:
Version 6 Xaw - libXaw6.so.6.0.1 SONAME=libXaw.so.6
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:53 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
the versioned filename varients:
Version 6 Xaw - libXaw6.so.6.0.1 SONAME=libXaw.so.6
Version 7 Xaw
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:53 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
the versioned filename varients:
Version 6 Xaw -
Albert == Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:53:17PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is another way to solve the problem; we can change the SONAME in
the versioned filename varients:
Version 6 Xaw
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:24 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
But libXaw.so.major_number is the default behaviour for libtool. Are you
using -release instead of -version-info or -version-number? I think
-version-number will give you exactly what you need.
I want the SONAME to be libXaw.so.6,
Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't know this. But trying to make -version-info get the SONAME you
need is an abuse of libtool in any case. I think -version-number option
available in recent versions of libtool is perfect for this.
When introducing libtool with a libraries
24 matches
Mail list logo
