On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:09:14PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Unfortunately, there is a design problem with libtool. There should
> be libtool command-line switches to support this, but instead these
> options must be set when libtool is configured. These options are set
> via an autoconf co
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Praveen Jain wrote:
> >>
> >> The main motivation is to reduce the build time
> >> approximately by a factor of 2 which would be a
> >> tremendous help for us.
> >
> >--disable-shared or --disable-static. If you want static and shared,
> >you don't have a choice.
>
> Where do yo
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:11:39PM -0800, Asim Suter wrote:
> I see that libtool compiles every C source file two times
> 1) once to generate ".lo" files
> 2) second time to generate ".o" files
>
> Is it possible to "tell" libtool to generate
> only one type of object file ? My belief is that
>
Hello,
We build shared libraries and executables on
a Linux system for Pentium processor.
We use libtool along with automake and autoconf
as part of our build infrastructure.
I see that libtool compiles every C source file two times
1) once to generate ".lo" files
2) second time to generate "
