On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:01:23AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
or something?
I prefer `something' :-)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with ltdl.h
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
I just updated to the latest CVS version of libtool and I
On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in C++
struct lt_dlhandle
automatically define a TYPENAME i.e. makes an implicit
typedef struct lt_dlhandle lt_dlhandle;
However, IIRC, it is valid to have the implicit name overridden by
another definition of the
On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in C++
struct lt_dlhandle
automatically define a TYPENAME i.e. makes an implicit
typedef struct lt_dlhandle lt_dlhandle;
However, IIRC, it is valid to have the implicit name
On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in C++
struct lt_dlhandle
automatically define a TYPENAME i.e. makes an implicit
typedef struct lt_dlhandle lt_dlhandle;
On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does NOT appear
to be valid C++ code
I've just managed to compile:
typedef struct foo foo;
Yes that will compile but
typedef struct foo * foo
Won't, which is what the line in
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:53:00PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in C++
struct lt_dlhandle
automatically define a
On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
or something?
I prefer `something' :-)
How about `typedef struct lt_dlhandle_struct lt_dlhandle'?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
I just updated to the latest CVS version of libtool and I noticed two
problems.
1) Even though I defined LT_NON_POSIX_NAMESPACE I still can't get lt_ptr_t
to work. After looking at the header file I discovered the really is
LT_FUBAR_NAMESPACE.
