Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Vikram,
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:36:25PM CEST:
Just ran into a problem, with our old solution, both the .a and the .so
need to have -fPIC. Now how do i get separate CPPFLAGS to them when
using libtool?
You should be looking
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 03:22:09PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:36:25PM CEST:
Just ran into a problem, with our old solution, both the .a and the
.so need to have -fPIC. Now how do i get separate CPPFLAGS to them
Vikram Ambrose wrote:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:59:38PM CEST:
Thanks all. However modifying the code is not a possibility. I do
understand that the code is not designed properly. I am looking for a
way to configure the build tools to
Hello Vikram,
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:36:25PM CEST:
Just ran into a problem, with our old solution, both the .a and the .so
need to have -fPIC. Now how do i get separate CPPFLAGS to them when
using libtool?
You should be looking into convenience archives, or, if
Roumen Petrov wrote:
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:54:35PM CEST:
However I need to pass separate CPPFLAGS to the objects destined
for the
shared library as opposed to the objects destined for the library
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:59:38PM CEST:
Thanks all. However modifying the code is not a possibility. I do
understand that the code is not designed properly. I am looking for a
way to configure the build tools to build the code properly instead of
configuring the
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:59:38PM CEST:
Thanks all. However modifying the code is not a possibility. I do
understand that the code is not designed properly. I am looking for a
way to configure the build tools to build the code properly
Dear All,
I have some code that I am trying to build with the aid of libtool,
autoconf and automake. I require both a static and shared library of my
code, and libtool provides this functionality beautifully.
However I need to pass separate CPPFLAGS to the objects destined for the
shared
Vikram Ambrose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Vikram Ambrose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can someone suggest a way I can produce both a static and shared library
with libtool/autoconf/automake that are compiled with different CPPFLAGS?
You can use #ifdef PIC.
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:54:35PM CEST:
However I need to pass separate CPPFLAGS to the objects destined for the
shared library as opposed to the objects destined for the library
archive.
As Andreas already replied, just use #ifdef PIC for shared and
#ifndef PIC for
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:54:35PM CEST:
However I need to pass separate CPPFLAGS to the objects destined for the
shared library as opposed to the objects destined for the library
archive.
As Andreas already replied, just
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vikram Ambrose wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 03:54:35PM CEST:
However I need to pass separate CPPFLAGS to the objects destined for the
shared library as opposed to the objects destined for the library
archive.
As Andreas
12 matches
Mail list logo
