Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK to apply?
Yes, and thanks.
Do you think we need to announce this change in NEWS?
Not really.
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Hi Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:45:37AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK to apply?
Yes, and thanks.
Done, thanks!
Cheers,
Ralf
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:38:05PM CEST:
I'm guessing the issue is that the tarball builder reuses the same
SVN checkout and just reruns autoreconf without --force. The
output from autoreconf --help says:
Run `autoconf' (and `autoheader', `aclocal
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:19:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
At the same time let's get rid of the
CONFIGURE-AC argument we're suggesting there but which didn't work right
anyway. But let's not actually change the functionality, so that what
works continues to. (A bit fragile, I know; I
Hi Olly,
* Olly Betts wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:56:28PM CEST:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:19:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
At the same time let's get rid of the
CONFIGURE-AC argument we're suggesting there but which didn't work right
anyway. But let's not actually change the
On 2006-05-17, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the point is that
autoreconf subdir/foobar.ac
simply won't cause the called tools to use foobar.ac, but the first that
exists in the list
subdir/configure.ac
subdir/configure.in
Yeah, I know.
My thought was that it is
