Subject line says is all really, I ask because I've cleaned up the
Debian libtool 1.4 package and got a small handful of patches which
could be useful if anyone forsees a libtool 1.4.4 coming up at any point
in the future.
If not no worries, a couple of these patches need to be applied to 1.5
too
The 1.4 release cycle is officially finished. We encourage everyone
to use 1.5 (or development 1.5.0a), and to submit patches to fix any
flaws.
Bob
On 30 Jul 2003, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Subject line says is all really, I ask because I've cleaned up the
Debian libtool 1.4 package and got
When using CC=cc on IRIX 6.x, ld is used to create shared libraries.
However:
hardcode_libdir_flag_spec='${wl}-rpath ${wl}$libdir'
This causes -Wl,-rpath to be passed to ld. Unfortunately, ld
recognizes -rpath but not -Wl so we get errors like:
(null): WARNING 1 : Unknown option: Wl,-rpath
,
which told me to pass linker directives in the prog_LDADD variable,
which I did, until it broke, and it seems that libtool 1.4 is what
changes this behaviour.
I'm not sure why it's using libtool to link my program -- is this
necessary, avoidable?
Ian
On Sat, 2001-10-06 at 17:15, Peter Eisentraut
libtool; I'm just using automake,
which told me to pass linker directives in the prog_LDADD variable,
which I did, until it broke, and it seems that libtool 1.4 is what
changes this behaviour.
I'm not sure why it's using libtool to link my program -- is this
necessary, avoidable?
Ian
I don't know where to ask this, but this is as good a place as any I
guess (rpm-list and libtool-list).
My problem is this:
I have two dynamic libraries in the project. One of them depends on the
other, so I have
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = libmsgevents.la libdvdcontrol.la
libmsgevents_la_LDFLAGS =
Ian Peters writes:
Yes, the end goal is to have all of the libraries between the -Bstatic
and -Bdynamic linked statically, while keeping a dynamic binary against
libc and ld-linux.
You do realize that this goal cannot be portably accomplished, so you
perhaps shouldn't use libtool?
--
Peter
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 02:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 01:14:52AM -0400, Ian Peters wrote:
Conspicuously missing are the linker directives to be passed to gcc,
namely -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic. I do this to produce a binary
that is linked statically except for
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 02:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's bad is their position has been reordered. What version of
libtool are you using? I take it you want all libraries between
-Bstatic and -Bdynamic statically linked?
Forgot to say, this has been tested with libtool 1.4 and 1.4.2
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 02:21, Tim Van Holder wrote:
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 07:14, Ian Peters wrote:
Unfortunately, with libtool 1.4.x, I get this instead (after a much,
much longer time):
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -o
[snip]
installer-ui.o
-lm -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXi
-lXext -lX11 -lm -luuid -lcrypt -lz -lutil -Wl,-Bdynamic
Ditto.
Unfortunately, with libtool 1.4.x, I get this instead (after a much,
much longer time):
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -o
installer
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 3:35 am, Don Anderson wrote:
Hello libtoolers,
Here is a patch to run libtool 1.4 on QNX. I set
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method to 'unknown' because I was unable to
successfully run the test suite: since I don't have direct access to
the QNX box, I'm working through
Hello libtoolers,
Here is a patch to run libtool 1.4 on QNX. I set
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method to 'unknown' because I was unable to
successfully run the test suite: since I don't have direct access to
the QNX box, I'm working through it with someone else. However, these
changes do allow us
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Internet
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@Internet (bcc: Danny
Backx/U27113/KB/KredAlm)
Subject:libtool 1.4 bug
Hi,
The attached file contains excerpts of the LessTif build process.
We think a libtool bug may be the cause of our build problems.
You'll see in the make install
This patch got me through the ugly ethereal build.
I applied them to libtool, so obviously they need
to be applied to the ltmain.in file. I do not know
if every one of these is strictly required, I started
getting impatient. :-)
Regards,
Bruce
$ gdiff -u libtool /tmp/LIBTOOL
---
-static and it worked fine (we have a customized version of
libtool 1.4 but out changes don't affect Solaris).
--
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
built with --enable-shared
--enable-static and it worked fine (we have a customized version of
libtool 1.4 but out changes don't affect Solaris).
as in:
./configure
I couldn't use downloadable packages (like yours) because
/usr/local is for global admins, so I have to configure for
/u/local
/X11R6/lib -L/usr/local/lib/mysql
-L/usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif2.1/lib -lXm -Wl,-soname -Wl,libMrm.so.2 -o
.libs/libMrm.so.2.0.1
/usr/i486-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lXm
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
# libXm.la - a libtool library file
# Generated by ltmain.sh - GNU libtool 1.4 (1.920
I installed libtool 1.4 in the wrong place and then tried make uninstall
before doing a reconfigure. It complained about not finding install-info
or something - I didn't care to investigate further.
Lars J
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi folks,
I had this discussion with Gary on this list a week or
so ago. Does UnixWare 7.x.x load deplibs, or does libltdl
have to do so...
Trying to build libtool-1.4.
I got an answer back from comp.unix.sco.programmer.
In summary, I think Dave Prosser, from SCO, trys to
explain
Hello Libtoolers,
On this, the 2nd anniversary of the release of libtool-1.3, the Libtool Team
is delighted to announce Libtool version 1.4: Available now from
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.tar.gz and shortly from
all GNU mirror sites. You will find diffs and xdeltas from libtool
numbering that is apparently going to be
used on the next autoconf release, I think the libtool README might benefit
from the following patch. Are the suggested changes all correct?
diff -ur libtool-1.4.orig/README libtool-1.4/README
--- libtool-1.4.orig/README Wed Dec 13 20:53:45 2000
+++ libtool
On Apr 24, 2001, Gary V.Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I don't want to hold up the release any longer, I am going to
break the commit rules and remove all use of the inline keyword (and
the AC_C_INLINE) from libltdl before I roll up the release -- unless
someone asks me not to in the
On Wednesday 25 April 2001 8:33 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 24, 2001, Gary V.Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I don't want to hold up the release any longer, I am going to
break the commit rules and remove all use of the inline keyword (and
the AC_C_INLINE) from libltdl before
On Monday 23 April 2001 3:30 pm, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I must say that my spidey-sense tells me that `static inline' is a GNU
extension...
Yep, but the autoconf macro AC_C_INLINE is used, which #define's inline
away in config.h, if inline
On Sunday 22 April 2001 7:09 am, you wrote:
Hello.
A friend told me the about your libtool 1.4 test mail, so I tried it on
a few platforms..
Great! Thankyou for posting your results. I am unable to reproduce your
quote.test failure on my Solaris 8 box with the current HEAD revision
On 23 April, 2001 - Gary V. Vaughan sent me these 6.3K bytes:
On Sunday 22 April 2001 7:09 am, you wrote:
Hello.
A friend told me the about your libtool 1.4 test mail, so I tried it on
a few platforms..
Great! Thankyou for posting your results. I am unable to reproduce your
On 23 April, 2001 - Gary V. Vaughan sent me these 6.3K bytes:
On Sunday 22 April 2001 7:09 am, you wrote:
Hello.
A friend told me the about your libtool 1.4 test mail, so I tried it on
a few platforms..
Great! Thankyou for posting your results. I am unable to reproduce your
On Monday 23 April 2001 2:00 am, I wrote:
I'm holding off the release for a day or two...
Revised release date tomorrow April 24, around 10pm GMT unless someone points
out a serious enough problem to me before then.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __ _
On Saturday 21 April 2001 11:20 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan writes:
Failing major disasters, or the discovery of a showstopper, there are
less than 18 hours to go before the release of libtool-1.4 from CVS HEAD.
I think that's going to be a problem for you:
libtool$ make
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Hi everyone,
$ ./configure
...
Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.900 2001/04/20 20:55:18)
...
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
This is an a.out
Hi everyone,
Failing major disasters, or the discovery of a showstopper, there are less
than 18 hours to go before the release of libtool-1.4 from CVS HEAD.
I would be grateful for any host triplets (as reported by
the libtool configure script) on which you are able to run
Alexandre Oliva writes:
On Apr 18, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I just deleted my savannah#2 certificate, and I can can now
get in.
Me too. Sorry about the noise.
I am truly sorry this was necessary. I don't know yet why the
new
On Apr 18, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I just deleted my savannah#2 certificate, and I can can now
get in.
Me too. Sorry about the noise.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 4:35 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 17, 2001, Thomas Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gary, Alexandre and the rest of the team!
Gee! So you're still alive, after all! You had got me worried :-)
Wow. Hi Thomas. I'm afraid I didn't even list you as a
Gary V. Vaughan writes:
Nup. Sorry. There is no way to log in to savannah at the moment,
as there is still no SSL certificate =(O| I'm Ccing Loic, who might
be able to shed some light, since I can't find any reference to the
certification issue since the last one was regenerated in
Hi Gary,
On 18-Apr-2001 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'd rather not, since there is a difficult merge on the other side of the
release and I won't have the time to help Alexandre with that in 2 weeks if
we wait that long =(O| I really need to finalise 1.4 so that I can
concentrate on my book
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan writes:
Nup. Sorry. There is no way to log in to savannah at the moment,
as there is still no SSL certificate =(O| I'm Ccing Loic, who might
be able to shed some light, since I can't find any reference to
Hi Gary, Alexandre and the rest of the team!
On 11-Apr-2001 Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I plan to clear any patches left in the queue, test on the hosts I have
access to and release libtool-1.4 from HEAD upon my return. I would be
extremely appreciative of feedback from libtool users about
39 matches
Mail list logo
