Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-22 Thread Bruno Haible
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Bruno all-local $(libfoo_la_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) Hmmm, why do you need this since $(ARGZ_H) is already in $(BUILT_SOURCES), and all depends on $(BUILT_SOURCES)? You are right, the presence of $(ARGZ_H) in $(BUILT_SOURCES) makes this rule unnecessary. (Historically,

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-22 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You are right, the presence of $(ARGZ_H) in $(BUILT_SOURCES) makes this rule unnecessary. (Historically, the rule predates the use of BUILT_SOURCES.) Thanks for the hint. I propose this patch in gnulib. Thanks; I installed that. At the same time I

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Bruno == Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Bruno all-local $(libfoo_la_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) Hmmm, why do you need this since $(ARGZ_H) is already in $(BUILT_SOURCES), and all depends on $(BUILT_SOURCES)? -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz ___

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bruno, * Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:23:26PM CEST: The modules in gnulib are normally used in a directory that creates a single library, say libfoo.la, and in this case a line like all-local $(lib_OBJECTS): $(ARGZ_H) is meant to be changed to all-local

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: It's a bit tricky to reproduce: You need a system which has no argz.h, then configure, then `make check' without prior make. If you had ever run `make' before in this build tree, even after `make clean' the dependency information is stored in libltdl/.deps/*.Plo, and

FYI: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:25:01PM CEST: * Sven Verdoolaege wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:11:36AM CEST: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:31:48AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: It's this version that fails on solaris. Let's see: ls libltdl/argz.h created by

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-06-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Sven, * Sven Verdoolaege wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:51:54PM CEST: On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:41:20PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Interesting. Please post $top_builddir/config.log (preferably bzip2 or gzip packed), and $top_builddir/config.h. Attached. Thanks. Do you use

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-06-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ this thread starts at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-06/msg00169.html ] Hi Sven, others, * Sven Verdoolaege wrote on Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:11:36AM CEST: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:31:48AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: It's this version that fails on solaris. Let's

libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-06-22 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
billie$ VERBOSE=yes sh tests/mdemo-make.test mdemo-make.test: === Running mdemo-make.test mdemo-make.test: === Running `make ' in mdemo (cd ../../libltdl; make `echo ./../../libltdl/libltdlc.la | sed 's,.*\.\./libltd l/,,g'`) make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/libtool-2.1a/libltdl' if /bin/bash

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-06-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Sven, * Sven Verdoolaege wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 05:06:08PM CEST: billie$ VERBOSE=yes sh tests/mdemo-make.test mdemo-make.test: === Running mdemo-make.test mdemo-make.test: === Running `make ' in mdemo (cd ../../libltdl; make `echo ./../../libltdl/libltdlc.la | sed

Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-06-22 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:41:20PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Interesting. Please post $top_builddir/config.log (preferably bzip2 or gzip packed), and $top_builddir/config.h. Attached. Do you use the Autoconf CVS version from a couple of weeks ago for bootstrapping? It had a nasty issue