Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Please don't forget the `random cruft'
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-09/msg00125.html
either. ;-
Applied (with a feeling of deja-vu) :).
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
___
Libtool mailing
Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2004-09-17T20:12+0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5?
) If you point me at the thread in the mail archives, and it backports easily,
) I'll apply it.
Bug report:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'll make a stable release from branch-1-5 (1.5.10 according to Release
Numbering on http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/contribute.html) if I can
apply Ralf's patch...
Are you planning on doing this fairly soon? I have some time this weekend
and could do it tomorrow.
What is branch-1-5's current role? There have been patches checked in as of
the 13th; will there be a 1.5.9 release? If so, can Ralf's patch (which
corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5?
I would like to pick the version of libtool to ship with our upcoming Fedora
Core 3 release. Should I
Hi Daniel!
Daniel Reed wrote:
What is branch-1-5's current role?
1.5 is winding down its status as stable branch.
There have been patches checked in as
of the 13th; will there be a 1.5.9 release?
There are no concrete plans to make another release from branch-1-5 at the moment.
If so, can
On 2004-09-17T20:12+0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) If so, can Ralf's patch (which corrects RH#55176) be applied to branch-1-5?
) If you point me at the thread in the mail archives, and it backports easily,
) I'll apply it.
Bug report:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 09:12:04PM CEST:
Daniel Reed wrote:
What is branch-1-5's current role?
1.5 is winding down its status as stable branch.
There have been patches checked in as
of the 13th; will there be a 1.5.9 release?
There are no concrete plans to
