Re: libtool windows dll suffix revision

2008-03-15 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/15/08, Peter Rosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With your suggestion of always using age, you would get dll-7.dll and dll-8.dll for your examples, but you would also get dll-7.dll for my example, and then you would have the same file name for two incompatible dlls, which is a lot worse

Re: libtool windows dll suffix revision

2008-03-15 Thread Roumen Petrov
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On 3/15/08, Peter Rosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With your suggestion of always using age, you would get dll-7.dll and dll-8.dll for your examples, but you would also get dll-7.dll for my example, and then you would have the same file name for two incompatible dlls, which

Re: libtool windows dll suffix revision

2008-03-14 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, I appreciate any reply regarding this. The win32 build is supported in 2.2 series, and this issue remains. Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. On 3/9/08, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Please CC me as I am not subscribed. Was something in the following discussion progressed?

libtool windows dll suffix revision

2008-03-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, Please CC me as I am not subscribed. Was something in the following discussion progressed? http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2000-09/msg00053.html From: Gary V. Vaughan gvv at techie dot com Libtool translates the 5:4:3 into a system specific version number for the soname to help the