Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Sunday 01 April 2001 11:50 am, Michael Matz wrote: Hi, On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4. Huh? Seems like I'm missing something here. What is this bug

Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hello. On Sunday 01 April 2001 1:16 pm, Michael Matz wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I have applied the following to HEAD (and similar to MLB). Why also MLB? Was it really broken there too? I ask, because I _definitely_ got multiple libraries in link commands.

Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hello. On Sunday 01 April 2001 3:59 pm, Michael Matz wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I see. Argh, This then again means, that libtool will probably generate excessively large link commands for KDE. Yes it does =(O| Although ugly, Robert has applied the following

Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-04-01 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 1, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is fast becoming a large post-1.4 issue to my mind... What? Did you really mean to have this problem addresses in 1.4? 1.4 doesn't even have piecewise linking, IIRC. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see

alpha release schedule [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-03-30 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Friday 30 March 2001 4:07 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 29, 2001, Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4. Huh?

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-29 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to release libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a feature freeze in HEAD so that we can shake the bugs out and release 1.4 a week or two later. Is that okay with everyone? Then we can finally get on with the messy

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to release libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a feature freeze in HEAD so that we can shake the bugs out and release 1.4 a week or two later. Is

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-29 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to release libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a feature freeze in HEAD so that we can shake

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-29 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4. Huh? Seems like I'm missing something here. What is this bug

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-09 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Edward, Your patch is brilliant. Thankyou. I need to build a cygwin installation before I can test it, but by inspection it looks fine to me. This stuff is all I have left on my Libtool TODO list: As soon as we have it committed, I'd like to make a candidate release for libtool-1.4 so

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 04:08:14AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Your patch is brilliant. Thankyou. Ditto. This patch is much appreciated. Thank you, Edward. cgf ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]