On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I would love to be able to supply LDFLAGS options to configure and
have them work appropriately within the configure script, and then
work similarly for libtool.
Note that `-Wl,-Bstatic' will *not* be useful in LDFLAGS, but LIBS at
best, because of
Hallo Ralf,
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This fixes the failure uncovered by the new tests posted previously.
OK to apply?
Looks good to me! Please go right ahead :-)
* libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): Fix logic for
adding run paths to also add paths for installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
|
| Hmm. If we were to invent new flags, I currently like
| -force-static, -prefer-shared
| best.
|
|
|Note though that Ralf has -Bstatic defined as:
|If @var{output-file} is a program, prefer linking statically
|
Hallo Ralf, Bob, Peter, Eric,
Is this patch really necessary for 2.0? I think that introducing so
much code churn in to libtool at this stage is going to bring yet more
release delays. Surely the feature is useful and desireable, but I
really *really* want to avoid more delays for 2.0.
Now is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
|
| Hmm. If we were to invent new flags, I currently like
| -force-static, -prefer-shared
| best.
|
|
|Note though that Ralf has -Bstatic defined as:
|If @var{output-file} is a program, prefer linking statically
|
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
According to: http://tkd.kicks-ass.net/GnuLibtoolProject/RoadMap, the
three remaining release blockers for 2.0 are:
* ! libtool.m4 macro ordering/requirement audit. pending
* ! LT_WITH_LTDL should build libltdl by default; currently
nothing
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:47:51AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:40:51PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
Fine. -Bstatic on Linux means Do not link against shared libraries.
anyway.
Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
linker-only option. It is likely useful to use
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
linker-only option. It is likely useful to use something new which
won't be confusing due the different meaning between GCC and ld.
How about -static-only and -shared-only?
Note though that
Hi Bob, Albert,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 07:47:51AM CET:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
linker-only option. It is likely useful to use something new which
won't be confusing due the different meaning between GCC and ld.
How about -static-only and -shared-only?
Note though that
Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:39:02AM CET:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
linker-only option. It is likely useful to use something new which
won't be confusing due the different meaning
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I could find, but IMHO
they are not very self-explanatory for users not used to them.
-prefer-static,
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I could find, but IMHO
they are not very self-explanatory for users not
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I could find, but IMHO
they are not very self-explanatory for users not used to them.
-prefer-static,
The 1.5.20 regression fix for `-static' for programs has made it clear
that per-deplib static/shared flags are desirable for libtool.
I will followup to this mail (to libtool-patches only for size, removing
all Cc:s) with a patch to implement per-deplib flags for programs (for
CVS HEAD) and add
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:01:53PM CET:
I will followup to this mail (to libtool-patches only for size) with a
patch to implement per-deplib flags for programs (for CVS HEAD) and add
comprehensive tests for the static flags.
Here goes the test. Note that the tests
The 1.5.20 regression fix for `-static' for programs has made it clear
that per-deplib static/shared flags are desirable for libtool.
I will followup to this mail (to libtool-patches only for size, removing
all Cc:s) with a patch to implement per-deplib flags for programs (for
CVS HEAD) and add
18 matches
Mail list logo
