hi,libtools group£¬
When I use libtool ,I meet touble, can you give me a hand,In a project ,there
are many directory,at the source code directory, it have subdirectory,how can I
compile them to a lib,
and how to link the all directory binary to a lib.
thanks
wangtp
5/23/2001
Hi,
Thanks a lot for all your impressive work.
I just got myself autoconf/automake/libtool from CVS and compiled the stuff
on a system that had autoconf, automake, but no libtool.
I first installed the new autoconf/automake, then I did
% ./bootstrap
% make
During this make I get complaints
sorry for the excessive addressing, but this topic touches all auto-tools.
I am in the process of convincing some people to move their Borland based
source code development to proprietary free models. As you may guess, this is
an extremly difficult task, requiring more pedagogical than technical
This is not restricted to borland compilers, there are quite
some C-compilers on unix-systems that quite some people like
to see supported, however most of the autotools developers
do live in a quite gnu'ish/gcc'ish environment, and every now
and then, a gmake'ish/gcc pecularity slips in that
Hello,
for some reason this hasn't been a problem (with libtool 1.4) until
just now (maybe upgrading to glibc 2.2.3 from 2.2.2 triggered it)?
Anyway, the following demo fails badly when installed in a
non-standard location (as required by Debian packages):
[509] [snoopy:stable:bam]
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi all,
I think the great misunderstanding is that the autotools are
not targeting real multiplatform development, but Unix centric
distribution of (GNU) OpenSource Software.
To do real multiplatform, multitools development the autotools
are difficult to use
On 23 May 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
On to your complaints.
Martin * Mixing up debug and non debug build, do both causes double
Martin compile time, double diskspace and x-time more RAM for the
Martin debugger. Imagine to need 10 GB for Openoffice debug build and
Martin more than 2GB RAM to
