On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I could find, but IMHO
they are not very self-explanatory for users not used to them.
-prefer-static,
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Magne Oestlyngen wrote on Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:50:04PM CET:
I just looked at the libtool docs to understand -version-info, and
believe there is a bug in the documentation (6.3 Updating library
version information):
Point 5 says: If any
It's really nice to mention stuff exactly once. :-)
OK to apply this to HEAD? It really is a work saver for me.
Note that it is easier to kill the `tests/' part of the file names than
to try to build the suite from $(top_srcdir) because then also
package.m4 needs to live there, for example, and
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I could find, but IMHO
they are not very self-explanatory for users not used to them.
-prefer-static,
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
`-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common names I could find, but IMHO
they are not very self-explanatory for users not
