Re: libltdl fix

2000-09-04 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 1, 2000, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 1, 2000, Patrick Tullmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think something isn't quite right in the shared-library detection code in configure. (Quite possible when cross-compiling to the OSKit.) But, this patch at least lets my

OpenBSD 2.7

2000-09-04 Thread Justin R. Smith
Is anything known about inter-library dependencies on OpenBSD/i386 with gcc 2.95? I'm porting the Helix Gnome distribution to this platform and have encountered problems with the ability to support interlibrary dependencies being 'unknown'. The Helix Gnome distribution comes with many levels of

RE: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-04 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
-Original Message- From: Gary V. Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 2:05 PM To: Charles Wilson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DLL naming conventions skipped It doesn't work for Michael's 'user 2' -- the guy who

Re: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-04 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 04:39:51PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Sep 3, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * When installing a libtool (.la) library: - libfoo.la goes to $prefix/lib - libfooiface.dll goes to $prefix/bin - libfoo.dll.a goes to

Re[4]: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-04 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Alexandre, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes. And know why? Because they want to support outdated betas! AO Come on. I've already posted a message saying that we should probably AO give up on supporting early betas, as long as we detect them as such AO and disable the

Re[4]: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-04 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Gary, Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, just when I thought I have some free time, that boss contrived rush. I answer on important points. (Technical note: what corresponds to shared library on *nix system is a pair of implib,dll on win32. *Pair*) GVV You're right. I

Re[2]: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-04 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Charles, Charles S. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ Talk about versioning on win32 skipped - I'd rather have DLLs being built first, and them go for elaborating their versioning. But I agree with Gary's following letter that mere libfoo.dll.a should suffice - if one would like to have

Re[2]: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-04 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Alexandre, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AO On Sep 3, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * When installing a libtool (.la) library: - libfoo.la goes to $prefix/lib - libfooiface.dll goes to $prefix/bin I'm glad this is acknowledged. -

Re: libltdl fix

2000-09-04 Thread Patrick Tullmann
Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Sep 1, 2000, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the right fix is to arrange for all references to shlib_ext to be enclosed in #ifdef LTDL_SHLIB_EXT/#endif. Please try this patch: [patch deleted.] Thanks Alexandre! This works for me. I

Re: libltdl fix

2000-09-04 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Sep 4, 2000, Patrick Tullmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me know if you would like me to check patch this into the Kaffe CVS. Please go ahead. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com,