-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tested with vendor make on OSF/1 5.1, AIX 5.2, IRIX 6.5, HPUX 10.20
and Solaris 10. Apart from IRIX, VPATH builds also work from a fresh
dist tarball on the other architectures -- to my surprise! I've also
successfully completed a full test run for
Hello Brad, Matthieu,
* Brad wrote on Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:32:36PM CEST:
The following diffs to fix libtool for OpenBSD archs without shared libraries
support is a re-application to the appropriate branches of the 1.5 patch
Matthieu commited to the OpenBSD ports tree..
Hello Peter, Martin, all
* Martin Koeppe wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:45:22PM CET:
the following problems occured:
- without ./bootstrap, libtool-2.1 doesn't have
config.guess/config.sub files, so I used
./configure --build=i586-pc-interix5.2.
OTOH, libltdl/config has very old
On 26 Mar 2007, at 19:13, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:10:21PM CEST:
Tested with vendor make on OSF/1 5.1, AIX 5.2, IRIX 6.5, HPUX 10.20
and Solaris 10. Apart from IRIX, VPATH builds also work from a fresh
dist tarball on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applied to HEAD, including changes suggested by Ralf.
Index: ChangeLog
from Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The stamp-vcl file rules caused non-gnu make programs to rerun
parts of the configuration process on each invocation.
Hallo Ralf,
On 26 Mar 2007, at 21:07, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:56:14PM CEST:
On 26 Mar 2007, at 19:13, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Second, can we remove the `$target
is up to date' output for all thingies? Please also update NEWS to
reflect this
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:25:38PM CEST:
Now, where is the list of issues that need to be worked on kept
nowadays? Is http://wiki.azazil.net relevant anymore?
Yes, mostly. I just marked that GNU make issue as fixed there,
and have been going over it some weeks ago
Hallo Ralf,
On 26 Mar 2007, at 22:03, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:25:38PM CEST:
Now, where is the list of issues that need to be worked on kept
nowadays? Is http://wiki.azazil.net relevant anymore?
Yes, mostly. I just marked that GNU make
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:20:32PM CEST:
On 26 Mar 2007, at 22:03, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
NEWS lists the regressions visible to users, and those really
should be the only issues we should still look at before a release,
if at all.
I spotted those too, but figured
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Peter, Martin, all
* Martin Koeppe wrote on Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:45:22PM CET:
the following problems occured:
- without ./bootstrap, libtool-2.1 doesn't have
config.guess/config.sub files, so I used
./configure --build=i586-pc-interix5.2.
OTOH,
Hi to all,
I would like to use libtool to manage versioning of a library called,
say mylib
libtool version is 1.5.6-6 under Linux Debian Sarge 3.1 stable
In the configure.ac at the project root, I have the lines:
mylib_CUR=69
mylib_REV=47
mylib_AGE=38
AC_SUBST(mylib_CUR)
AC_SUBST(mylib_REV)
On 26 Mar 2007, at 05:05, Jeevan Reddy wrote:
Hi,
I am installing GDAL1.3.2 and 1.4.0 but here I am getting error as
follows..
usr/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libjepg.la: No such file or directory
Hi Lucien,
On 25 Mar 2007, at 16:50, Lucien GENTIS wrote:
That means:
CURRENT is replaced by CURRENT - AGE (69 - 38 = 31)
REVISION is replaced by AGE
AGE is replaced by REVISION
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Libtool-versioning
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_.
Charles Wilson wrote:
I completely understand the motivation for the meat of this, speaking in
the hypothetical sense, but why would you ever want to build libbfd
shared?
I did --enable-shared at the top level, and bfd is the first one that
failed. I'm really more interested in the runtime
Hello Charles,
Here's a review based on the question how such a concept could be
expressed portably. I don't see how something like this would be of
great help if it could not be made to gracefully decay into something
still usable, on at least a useful set of platforms if not all of them.
*
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the bug report.
* Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:32:12AM CET:
../../libtool-HEAD/tests/subproject.at:56: $MAKE all $tst_dist
+ make all dist
[...]
mkdir: cannot create directory
On 2006-11-28, Duft Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could tell me how i can bring outlook to do so, i will gladly ;o)
Off-topic, but in the interests of improving the readability of this
list (and others!):
Outlook:
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
Outlook
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues said:
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the bug report.
* Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:32:12AM CET:
../../libtool-HEAD/tests/subproject.at:56: $MAKE all $tst_dist
+ make all dist
[...]
mkdir: cannot create directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues said:
AFAICS, this can only happen if libltdl was treated with automake-1.9
and the tests run with automake-1.10 in place, so that the toplevel
package (named subproject-demo-2.1a) is treated with 1.10.
I'm not so
Olly Betts wrote:
On 2006-11-28, Duft Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could tell me how i can bring outlook to do so, i will gladly
;o)
Off-topic, but in the interests of improving the readability of this
list (and others!):
Outlook:
20 matches
Mail list logo
