libtool ChangeLog libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4

CVSROOT:/cvsroot/libtool Module name:libtool Changes by: Ralf Wildenhues rwild 08/01/14 21:18:49 Modified files: . : ChangeLog libltdl/m4 : ltoptions.m4 Log message: * libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4 (AC_ENABLE_SHARED): Fix to use new

libtool ChangeLog README [branch-1-5]

CVSROOT:/cvsroot/libtool Module name:libtool Branch: branch-1-5 Changes by: Ralf Wildenhues rwild 08/01/14 21:34:50 Modified files: . : ChangeLog README Log message: * doc/notes.texi: Mention AIX binutils deficiency for C++ code.

libtool ChangeLog doc/notes.texi

CVSROOT:/cvsroot/libtool Module name:libtool Changes by: Ralf Wildenhues rwild 08/01/14 21:34:19 Modified files: . : ChangeLog doc: notes.texi Log message: * doc/notes.texi: Mention AIX binutils deficiency for C++ code.

libtool ChangeLog libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh

CVSROOT:/cvsroot/libtool Module name:libtool Changes by: Ralf Wildenhues rwild 08/01/14 22:06:00 Modified files: . : ChangeLog libltdl/config : ltmain.m4sh Log message: Silence all non-warning output from `libtool --silent'. *

libtool ChangeLog Makefile.maint

CVSROOT:/cvsroot/libtool Module name:libtool Changes by: Ralf Wildenhues rwild 08/01/14 22:01:26 Modified files: . : ChangeLog Makefile.maint Log message: * Makefile.maint (fetch): Update to match upstream git sources. Pull `INSTALL' from

libtool ChangeLog configure.ac

CVSROOT:/cvsroot/libtool Module name:libtool Changes by: Ralf Wildenhues rwild 08/01/15 06:23:17 Modified files: . : ChangeLog configure.ac Log message: * configure.ac: Set libltdl nonrecursive option, to avoid configuring libltdl inside the

Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:29:05PM CET: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:23:24AM CET: On 8 Jan 2008, at 04:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: With this patch, I see in the log of make distcheck that the libltdl subdirectory is being configured. This

Re: make -s

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:29:33AM CET: For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to libtool-patches@gnu.org. Since repeatedly nobody stepped forward to do this, I wrote

Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch

Hello Gary, I've applied this patch to fix an omission in your change. Cheers, Ralf 2008-01-14 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4 (AC_ENABLE_SHARED): Fix to use new _LT_SET_OPTION semantics. Index: libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4

Re: make -s

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:29:33AM CET: For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to libtool-patches@gnu.org. Since repeatedly nobody stepped

withGCC unset

Hi, This patch should fix issues with withGCC. Ok for HEAD? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com 2008-01-14 Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Set GCC var for every tag, avoids need to set withGCC var. Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4

FYI: update `fetch' target

Hello, I've fixed the `fetch' target as below, in HEAD, and likewise in branch-1-5. Cheers, Ralf * Makefile.maint (fetch): Update to match upstream git sources. Pull `INSTALL' from gnulib instead of from Autoconf. Index: Makefile.maint

Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch

Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:22:07AM CET: On 15 Jan 2008, at 03:24, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: OK to apply this fix (feeling a bit hackish, but does exactly what's needed)? Absolutely. Sorry I didn't get to it sooner myself. I can't think of a cleaner way to

Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch

Hallo Ralf, On 15 Jan 2008, at 14:24, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Expect a fix for the remaining fallout from 333 soon. I thought this was the last thing? What else needs to be addressed before I can roll an alpha (excepting Peter's current work)? Cheers, Gary -- Gary V. Vaughan

Re: make -s

On Sunday 13 January 2008 17:46, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Richard Hacker wrote on Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:21:50PM CET: However, libtool is responsible for parsing *make's *FLAGS Now, this contradicts your statement (*) above, no? Oppps, my mistake. Sorry for confusing everyone :-( No, as you

Re: make -s

* Richard Hacker wrote on Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:24:12AM CET: On Sunday 13 January 2008 17:46, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Richard Hacker wrote on Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:21:50PM CET: However, libtool is responsible for parsing *make's *FLAGS Now, this contradicts your statement (*)

Re: make -s

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:29:33AM CET: For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Since repeatedly nobody stepped forward to do this, I wrote that

Re: make -s

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:29:33AM CET: For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Since repeatedly nobody stepped forward

Re: -prefer-pic

Hello Olly, * Olly Betts wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:42:16PM CET: The output from: libtool --help --mode=compile contains: -prefer-pic try to building PIC objects only -prefer-non-pic try to building non-PIC objects only Firstly, that's poor grammar (try to build

Re: make -s

* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:00:35PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Since repeatedly nobody stepped forward to do this, I wrote that patch myself now. OK to apply to HEAD? Yes. Thank you. Done, thanks! Cheers, Ralf ___

Re: make -s

On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:29:33AM CET: For whatever output is left done by libtool I expect that whoever want's it silenced hard enough will have enough motivation to send a patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Since repeatedly