CVSROOT:/sources/libtool
Module name:libtool
Changes by: Gary V. Vaughan gary 08/02/01 19:03:56
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog NEWS
libltdl: Makefile.inc
Log message:
* libltdl/Makefile.inc (EXTRA_DIST): Now that we're not using
Applied to HEAD as an obvious bugfix.
Index: ChangeLog
from Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* libltdl/Makefile.inc (EXTRA_DIST): Now that we're not using
Autoconf's AC_SOURCES macro, Automake can't trace our extra
source files argz, lt__dirent.c and lt__strl.c.
Hello Andreas,
* Andreas Schwab wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:43:25PM CET:
16. convenience.at:69: testing ...
./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } || (exit 77)
libtool: compile: g++ -c main1.cpp -o .libs/main1.o
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/libtool-2.1b/libtool: line 821:
Hi Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:00:59AM CET:
I installed amd64 debian in a VM and with this patch I get:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/gnu/4.1.2 /usr/lib /lib
I do not know if it is best to leave in the symlink and the original dir
( i.e. do cd $dir pwd as well as
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I have not yet tried to understand the logic of the patch.
Sorry. I have dropped it. libstdc++ should still be found because of the
compiler_search_path changes.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
Hi Bob,
On 1 Feb 2008, at 15:25, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Aha! I get the same error if I undo that patch in my GraphicsMagick
working copy,
run bootstrap with libtoolize (2.1b). I'll see if I can figure out
why I get this:
$ grep argz.lo Makefile
ltdl_LTLIBOBJS = argz.lo
Instead of
16. convenience.at:69: testing ...
./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } || (exit 77)
libtool: compile: g++ -c main1.cpp -o .libs/main1.o
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/libtool-2.1b/libtool: line 821: g++: command not found
libtool: compile: g++ -c a1.cpp -o .libs/a1.o
Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have a C++ compiler installed?
No.
What did configure report in the 'checking for g++' test?
checking for g++... no
checking for c++... no
checking for gpp... no
checking for aCC... no
checking for CC... no
checking for cxx... no
checking for
Hallo Andreas,
Thanks for the report.
What architecture is this building on?
On 1 Feb 2008, at 22:43, Andreas Schwab wrote:
16. convenience.at:69: testing ...
./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } ||
(exit 77)
So CXX is a non-zero length string other than no, or this
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
So, in effect, the patch I attached to my last message is the correct fix
for the error you were seeing.
Your micro-patch does work and does not bother me.
Do you think we should put undocumented support for the temporary interface
we had for a
Gary,
It turns out that your micro-patch does not actually work since there
is a failure during 'make distcheck':
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `ltdl/argz.lo', needed by
`ltdl/libltdlc.la'. Stop.
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have a C++ compiler installed?
No.
I have a similar situation with Fortran since I have no other use for
a Fortran compiler. In order to make the tests happy, I set both F77
and FC to 'no' in my
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
DTRT. There should be no need to tweak config.site for CXX if F77 and FC are
handled transparently...
It would be nice if F77 and FC were properly handled transparently.
Make it so! :-)
It seems that in Andreas's environment 'g++' appears out of
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce the release of GNU Libtool
1.5.26.
GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a
consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl,
which hides the comlexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries
(modules) behind a
On 2 Feb 2008, at 01:02, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have a C++ compiler installed?
No.
I have a similar situation with Fortran since I have no other use
for a Fortran compiler. In order to make the
On 2 Feb 2008, at 01:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Gary,
Hi Bob!
It turns out that your micro-patch does not actually work since
there is a failure during 'make distcheck':
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `ltdl/argz.lo', needed by `ltdl/
libltdlc.la'. Stop.
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
I have updated the web pages to the new style, please let me know about
typos etc. (or just fix them if you have commit :-p).
Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have a C++ compiler installed?
No.
I have a similar situation with Fortran since I have no other use for a
Fortran compiler. In order to make the tests
Hello Andreas,
* Andreas Schwab wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:43:25PM CET:
16. convenience.at:69: testing ...
./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } || (exit 77)
libtool: compile: g++ -c main1.cpp -o .libs/main1.o
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/libtool-2.1b/libtool: line 821:
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 01:11:59PM CET:
So, in effect, the patch I attached to my last message is the correct
fix for the error you were seeing.
Confirmed. Thanks for analysing this, and thanks also for cutting the
release!
Do you think we should put
Hi Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:54:54PM CET:
I have updated the web pages to the new style, please let me know about
typos etc. (or just fix them if you have commit :-p).
I fixed a typo, committed the html_node pages, and added a
manual/.symlinks file to resolve the
21 matches
Mail list logo
