libtool COPYING [branch-1-5]

2008-02-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/libtool Module name:libtool Branch: branch-1-5 Changes by: Ralf Wildenhues rwild 08/02/09 22:04:41 Added files: . : COPYING Log message: Add COPYING file to CVS, GPLv2. CVSWeb URLs:

Re: CVS HEAD test 30

2008-02-09 Thread Tim Rice
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 03:00:05AM CET: I'm getting an UNEXPECTED PASS on test 30 of the new test suite on my UnixWare 7.1.4 box. Thanks for the bug report. I've installed this patch. 2008-02-08 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL

Re: Libtool 2.1b test results

2008-02-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 08:37:31AM CET: On Saturday 09 February 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 05:38:19AM CET: all of the tests pass with libtool-1.5.26 ... Do all of the old-style tests of 2.1b pass for you, too? The

2.1b license.

2008-02-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, It seems most of the files have this in them: # GNU Libtool is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version.

Re: Debugging Libtool's Insistence on Sourcing a Library from /usr/lib Rather Than LDFLAGS

2008-02-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Grant Erickson wrote on Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 07:04:36PM CET: I am attempting to debug an issue involving libtool from the avahi-0.6.22 package sourcing the local (i686-unknown-linux-gnu) version of libexpat (-lexpat) rather than the I one I direct it to find via LDFLAGS. [...] If I pass

Re: 2.1b license.

2008-02-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:21:35PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Kurt, * Kurt Roeckx wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:13:00PM CET: It seems most of the files have this in them: # GNU Libtool is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU

Re: 2.1b license.

2008-02-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: But the COPYING file has version 3 in it. This reminds me, when doing the 1.5.26 release I started with a clean checkout, automake added COPYING v3, by chance I noticed and copied in v2. Should we commit COPYING to cvs to avoid this? Peter -- Peter O'Gorman

Re: 2.1b license.

2008-02-09 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote: This reminds me, when doing the 1.5.26 release I started with a clean checkout, automake added COPYING v3, by chance I noticed and copied in v2. Should we commit COPYING to cvs to avoid this? That certainly seems like a wise idea, particulary since

Re: 2.1b license.

2008-02-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:05:36PM CET: On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Should we commit COPYING to cvs to avoid this? That certainly seems like a wise idea, particulary since there are legal implications if someone checks out the files and the COPYING

Re: CVS HEAD test 30

2008-02-09 Thread Tim Rice
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 03:00:05AM CET: I'm getting an UNEXPECTED PASS on test 30 of the new test suite on my UnixWare 7.1.4 box. Thanks for the bug report. I've installed this patch. 2008-02-08 Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL