This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project GNU Libtool.
The branch, master has been updated
via 31221926db25f9d8b34ac5d79412355896f3c70d (commit)
from
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project GNU Libtool.
The branch, master has been updated
via 627373516c5b0f0228b004eb03a397b782638128 (commit)
from
Hi!
I have tested this patch on MinGW/gcc and Cygwin/gcc and they are both
ok with the __declspec() notation. On MSVC, the test goes from skip
to fail, as it needs 2/2.
Cheers,
Peter
From 52972128c5952da628e033e4509208711906c3a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
I have tested this patch on MinGW/gcc and Cygwin/gcc and they are both
ok with the __declspec() notation. On MSVC, the test goes from skip
to fail, as it needs 2/2.
This patch looks good to apply, as does the 2/2 patch to make sure
that
Hi Bob,
Den 2010-09-20 17:57 skrev Bob Friesenhahn:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Peter Rosin wrote:
I have tested this patch on MinGW/gcc and Cygwin/gcc and they are both
ok with the __declspec() notation. On MSVC, the test goes from skip
to fail, as it needs 2/2.
This patch looks good to apply,
Hello Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:46:25AM CEST:
On 18 Sep 2010, at 13:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 07:20:18AM CEST:
+ sed -e '/^This is GNU Libtool,/,/^interface.$/c\
+This is an alpha testing release of GNU
Shipping a copy of autobuild.m4 makes it so that users need not
pre-install autobuild just for aclocal to find the macro AB_INIT.
* libltdl/m4/.gitignore: Drop autobuild.m4.
* libltdl/m4/autobuild.m4: New file, copied from autobuild.
* configure.ac (AB_INIT): Unconditionally call it.
On 09/20/2010 12:44 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:13:25PM CEST:
Shipping a copy of autobuild.m4 makes it so that users need not
pre-install autobuild just for aclocal to find the macro AB_INIT.
* libltdl/m4/.gitignore: Drop autobuild.m4.
*
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
/usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is the
last thread on this subject here:
* Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
/usr/lib64 being added as an rpath in builds. I found what I think is the
last thread on
* HACKING: Update.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
---
I'm pushing this under the obvious rule, given that the whole point
of my previous patch was to remove this dependency, and since this
is a docs-only patch.
ChangeLog |3 +++
HACKING |4 +---
2 files changed, 4
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:25:06PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Toshio Kuratomi wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:20:09PM CEST:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:04:04PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Greetings. I package software for Fedora and frequently get hit with
/usr/lib64 being added
Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-09-18 00:04 skrev Roumen Petrov:
Hi Peter,
Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
need_lib_prefix.at currently fails with MSVC.
Hmm probably test fail as shared library is build without -no-undefined flag.
Did libtool MSC allow creation of shared libraries without
Hallo Ralf,
On 21 Sep 2010, at 00:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
a regression: this code will cause 'make distcheck' to
fail, because at 'make dist' time the file will be rewritten before
being added to the tarball (if the version doesn't indicate a stable
release), then when distcheck tries to
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:05:46AM CEST:
Well, it does at least show that the script interacts correctly with
an error for make to help catch the case where someone commits a change
to the first paragraph of README without a matching edit to the sed
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Charles Wilson wrote:
Odd. My last test on MinGW was very successful. This was version 1.3266
(ef56e98f3 IIRC). I'll give it another go @ f0584085.
MinGW/MSYS:
old -- All 122 tests passed (2 tests were not run)
new -- 108 tests behaved as expected. 12 tests were
On 9/20/2010 11:31 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Charles Wilson wrote:
MinGW/MSYS:
old -- All 122 tests passed (2 tests were not run)
new -- 108 tests behaved as expected. 12 tests were skipped.
With Charles Wilson's assistance, I updated my MinGW environment to the
On 09/18/2010 10:03 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
If there is any reason you'd like me to hold off for a bit longer,
please speak up now!
Can we ship libltdl/m4/autobuild.m4 as a static copy of a decently
recent autobuild.m4,
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:35:21PM CEST:
On 09/18/2010 10:03 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours.
If there is any reason you'd like me to hold off for a bit longer,
please speak up now!
Can we ship
* Charles Wilson wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:39:38AM CEST:
On 9/19/2010 12:57 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 9/19/2010 11:45 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Unfortunately, my MinGW testing is not so successful. The testing still
quits part-way through with some sort of make-related issue (as
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild
server as I've been doing lately, much more than just posting
non-verbose results on the list here.
You don't need to have autobuild installed. When Eric installs
autobuild.m4
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:53:15PM CEST:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild
server as I've been doing lately, much more than just posting
non-verbose results on the list here.
You
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:17:34AM CEST:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de wrote:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:20:17PM CEST:
On 19 Sep 2010, at 18:14, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
23 matches
Mail list logo
