Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:42:53AM CEST: > > On 22 Sep 2010, at 11:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > You should not need to use git Automake for this, and please don't, > > because it currently carries a small regression over 1.11.1. > > Ah, okay. If it was taken care of by

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On 22 Sep 2010, at 11:29, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > You should not need to use git Automake for this, and please don't, > because it currently carries a small regression over 1.11.1. Ah, okay. If it was taken care of by fetch already, then there was no need for Peter to ping me :) Thanks for the

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Charles Wilson wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:10:39AM CEST: > On 9/20/2010 1:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild > > server... > > Here's what I use, more or less, to create the logs: > See, that's what was missing. You ha

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:21:55AM CEST: > On 22 Sep 2010, at 05:02, Charles Wilson wrote: > > Peter Rosin wrote: > >> Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the > >> 'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in > >> the release if it'

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/21/2010 9:21 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > I don't recall having done so in a while but, according to bootstrap: > > # It is okay for the bootstrap process to require unreleased autoconf > # or automake, as long as any released libtool will work with at least > # the newest stable versions of

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Chuck, Peter, Automakers, On 22 Sep 2010, at 05:02, Charles Wilson wrote: > Peter Rosin wrote: >> Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the >> 'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in >> the release if it's not too much to ask for. Thanks! > > Errr

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Charles Wilson
Peter Rosin wrote: > Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the > 'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in > the release if it's not too much to ask for. Thanks! Errr...is that kosher? I thought libtool was only supposed to ship the scripts provided by

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/20/2010 1:41 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild > server... > Here's what I use, more or less, to create the logs: > > ( ../libtool/configure [OPTIONS] \ > && make \ > && make -k check > cat test-suite.log tests/

Re: 2.4 Release in 24hrs

2010-09-21 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Gary, Den 2010-09-19 06:03 skrev Gary V. Vaughan: > I'm planning to make the belated 2.4 release in about 24 hours. Just a friendly ping, but only just now I pushed a change to the 'compile' script in automake and would like the new version in the release if it's not too much to ask for. Than