On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possible to do that, and gcc said only t
On 3/19/2011 6:25 AM, LRN wrote:
> I expect to find a lot of libtool-using projects that will require such
> hacks or workarounds, because `unrecognized option '-no-undefined'' is
> very common.
Ah, but actually -no-undefined should be added by the upstream
maintainers, in Makefile.am, to libfoo
On 19.03.2011 13:29, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
On 19.03.2011 0:17, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
On 18.03.2011 23:51, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use
LDFLAGS=-no-un
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
On 19.03.2011 0:17, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
On 18.03.2011 23:51, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
g
On 19.03.2011 0:17, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
On 18.03.2011 23:51, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '
