On 02/06/2012 06:35 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Much to my disappointment, I found that the newly-released libkmod v5
has made the following non-trivial change to its source tree, the latter
of which I want to bring to attention:
commit e479598b7d19ae7be45bf5329d6e4df32d646c16
This is probably going to be long and somewhat complex.
I am involved with a library project that has used the Autotools for
some time. We primarily focus on Linux and other UNIX platforms as well
as build using Mingw32 for Win32. All of this works well with shared
libraries.
We have a
Much to my disappointment, I found that the newly-released libkmod v5
has made the following non-trivial change to its source tree, the latter
of which I want to bring to attention:
commit e479598b7d19ae7be45bf5329d6e4df32d646c16
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
libtool-2.4.2 built and tested 100% on subject plat
host-triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
shell: /bin/bash
compiler: gcc
compiler flags: -O2 -H -mcpu=v9 -mfpu
linker: /usr/ccs/bin/ld (gnu? no)
libtool:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Much to my disappointment, I found that the newly-released libkmod v5
has made the following non-trivial change to its source tree, the latter
of which I want to bring
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Nate Bargmann wrote:
For some reason, that I have yet to understand, his static build
succeeded with all the backends in libdir but fails with them in pkgdir.
In my opinion, it would be better to be able to provide him with a
single .a library that includes the entirety of
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Hopefully your intention is only to illustrate what projects should not do
and not to submit a patch. This libkmod project seems to be less than two
months old and perhaps the developers still have a bit to learn about
library versioning.
Yes. We
Hi Bob
[ Please don't remove CC ]
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Much to my disappointment, I found that the newly-released libkmod v5
has made the following non-trivial change to its source tree,
On 02/07/2012 07:06 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Yes. We can always learn. It seems that this is not the case here.
There are other projects releasing like this and no one pointed out to
a reasonable argument against it. That means these arguments are not
valid in our case:
Again, use
On Wednesday 2012-02-08 03:45, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On 02/07/2012 07:06 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Yes. We can always learn. It seems that this is not the case here.
There are other projects releasing like this and no one pointed out to
a reasonable argument against it. That means these
10 matches
Mail list logo
