Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Robert Yang
Great, I verified that we nearly get the speed back: When build xz: libtool-2.4.5 libtool-2.4.2 bash:14s13s dash:12s11s // Robert On 02/10/2015 06:35 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2

libtool and sysroot

2015-02-10 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
I noted that --with-sysroot=yes calls(=yes seems undocumented?) lt_sysroot=`$CC --print-sysroot 2>/dev/null` Should not $CFLAGS be included here too as gcc may have its sysroot changed with --sysroot? Jocke ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 10:53 +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > On Feb 10, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: > >>> In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Richard, On Feb 10, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git bisection, timing >>> the performance of building xz w

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Richard, > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:36 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: >> In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git bisection, timing >> the performance of building xz with make -j1 using each different >> libtool. >> >> The

Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4

2015-02-10 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 23:36 +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 13:05 +, Richard Purdie wrote: > > In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git bisection, timing > > the performance of building xz with make -j1 using each different > > libtool. > > > > The issues com