Hey,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Thu, May 01, 2008 at 03:56:11PM CEST:
what is the best way to remove the checks of g++ and g77 when using
AM_PROG_LIBTOOL ?
define([AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG], [:])dnl
define([AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_F77_CONFIG], [:])dnl
This one.
thank you
Note
([AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_F77_CONFIG], [:])dnl
or something else ?
Note that the library can be used on old distributions, which can not be
upgraded to support newer libtool.
thank you
Vincent Torri
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
change.
It is on purpose. I've removed the spaces in the attached patch.
regards
Vincent Torri? libtool_cegcc.diff
? libtool_cegcc2.diff
? lt.diff
? patch_libtool_cvs.diff
? tests/testsuite.dir
Index: libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh
symbol
`evas_cache_image_colorspace'
and the same undefined ref for other symbols
Is it related ?
thank you
Vincent Torri
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 03:59:07PM CEST:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:03:48PM CEST:
My problem is that ECHO and OBJDUMP are not defined when I'm configuring
Maybe they just forgot to use AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL (or the LT_INIT
option win32-dll)?
omg, i didn't see that. Yes, it solves the problem
thank you very much
Vincent Torri
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
The README file explains it: run
make check VERBOSE=yes TESTS=tests/demo-shared.test tests/demo-make.test
tests/demo-exec.test
Also, please run the other half of the tests (the new testsuite) using
make check-local
and post tests/testsuite.log, please. You can run both with make -k
check.
of the other. Is it
reasonnable ? Is it compatible with former libtool ?
thank you
Vincent Torri
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Vincent,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:03:48PM CEST:
My problem is that ECHO and OBJDUMP are not defined when I'm configuring
libpng 1.2.26, while it's perfectly defined with another lib.
That typically means that you
why libtoolize does not copy those files with the
libpng library. And if someone knows why OBJDUMP is not defined, i would
be glad to know :)
thank you
Vincent Torri
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
Hey,
My problem is that ECHO and OBJDUMP are not defined when I'm configuring
libpng 1.2.26, while it's perfectly defined with another lib.
That typically means that you are using ltmain.sh from 2.2.x, but the
libtool.m4 macros from 1.5.x.
I'll try to investigate, then
I've grep'ed
?
thank you
Vincent Torri
PASS: tests/link.test
PASS: tests/link-2.test
PASS: tests/nomode.test
PASS: tests/objectlist.test
PASS: tests/quote.test
PASS: tests/sh.test
PASS: tests/suffix.test
PASS: tests/tagtrace.test
PASS: tests/cdemo-static.test
PASS: tests/cdemo-make.test
SKIP: tests/cdemo-exec.test
, as there are too much differences between cvs and libtool 2.2.2
and the patch can't apply to that version
Should I make the diff wrt libtool 2.2.2 ?? That would be strange
Vincent Torri
if the dll
of those libraries (lwsock2, libiberty, etc...) do not exist. I recall
that with previous version (1.5.22 or maybe the one below), it can not.
Do you have some suggestions to fix this ?
thank you
Vincent Torri--- libltdl/m4/ltoptions.m4 2008-04-01 20:23:20.0 +0200
2) With those patches, libtool can now create dll's with cegcc. But I have
that message when it tries to create the dll of my lib:
*** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lws2.
etc... saying it can not create the shared lib of my lib because the shared
version of
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
2) With those patches, libtool can now create dll's with cegcc. But I have
that message when it tries to create the dll of my lib:
*** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lws2
As I'm using mingw, i can test it too :)
Good!
do you want the results with mingw ? (libtool 2.3a) Or do you already have
the results ?
Vincent Torri
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
it's not my patch but here is what I've found:
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-cvs-commit/Week-of-Mon-20070226/144657.html
and it's not in the libtool patch list. Should all patches
(released 2 weeks ago) does not mention cegcc at all. Which is a bit
strange, imho.
thank you
Vincent Torri
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Vincent Torri wrote:
I would like to know when libtool supports the cegcc compiler. Right now,
libtool refuses to build shared libraries with that compiler. Also, there
are libtool patches for that compiler that were written
that describes what to do, exactly ?
As I'm using mingw, i can test it too :)
Vincent Torri
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
