Several questions about libtool

2012-01-06 Thread Stepan Kasal
, autodetection in automake) Regards, Stepan Kasal ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

libtool option to build both static and shared?

2009-11-12 Thread Stepan Kasal
to the user, but I feel that the solution outlined above would be more comfortable. Thank you for any help, Stepan Kasal ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: libtool option to build both static and shared?

2009-11-12 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Bob, thank you for your answer. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:50:03AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Stepan Kasal wrote: Is there an option that would tell libtool to build both, even though it was configured with --disable-static? I invented a solution that should

State of indirect deplibs

2008-01-07 Thread Stepan Kasal
of them away... But in the discussion above, Alex Oliva seems to state that --as-needed is the way to go. What's The Right Way(tm) here? Looking forward for an enlightment, Stepan Kasal ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Move from handcrafted makefile to libtool

2006-09-14 Thread Stepan Kasal
help, Stepan Kasal ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Tru64/OSF: BIN_SH revisited

2006-03-17 Thread Stepan Kasal
2006-03-17 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] * lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4 (AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE): Removed BIN_SH=xpg4, moved DUALCASE=1 ... (AS_SHELL_SANITIZE): ... here. Index: lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4 === RCS file

Re: Tru64/OSF: BIN_SH revisited

2006-03-17 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:20:49AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: Yes, except you need to modify the Autoconf documentation accordingly. I checked in the version attached to this mail. Stepan 2006-03-17 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] * lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4 (AS_BOURNE_COMPATIBLE

Re: subdir-objects with FORTRAN and location of objects

2005-10-05 Thread Stepan Kasal
that the following macro might be useful? -- Macro: AC_PROG_F77_C_O -- Macro: AC_PROG_FC_C_O Test whether the Fortran compiler accepts the options `-c' and `-o' simultaneously. Have a nice day, Stepan Kasal ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo

SP2NL cleanup

2005-08-16 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, attached please find a patch, which changes the check for EBCDIC. 1) I added a comment which explains why \n isn't portable enough. 2) space is space, no need to use \040 3) Change the logic, so that it potentially works even for other charsets. Stepan Kasal 2005-08-16 Stepan Kasal

Re: SP2NL cleanup

2005-08-16 Thread Stepan Kasal
to \100 in EBCDIC version. Here is a patch with fixes for the problems you pointed out. Stepan 2005-08-16 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] * config/general.m4sh (SP2NL, NL2SP): Simplify. Index: config/general.m4sh === RCS file

Re: reorganized config.status

2005-08-13 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:00:13AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Other way round. I tried to make you do the work for me and did not succeed at first. :) thank you very much. You did most of the work, so I won. I'll look at the patch soon. But two comments now, in a hurry: Hmm.

Re: FYI: loop in libtool m4 macros

2005-06-28 Thread Stepan Kasal
, but listed in m4.texi (renamed m4 builtins): m4_ifdef m4_pushdef These are documented implicitly, and in the latest CVS version they even go to the index, search for [EMAIL PROTECTED]''. So these are OK. Have a nice day, Stepan Kasal

Re: documenting m4sugar.m4 [WAS: loop in libtool m4 macros]

2005-06-28 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Gary, On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:58:05AM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: In order to hide some of our internal macros from aclocal, they are defined with m4_defun. Thanks for explanation. Interesting. Since aclocal doesn't do any tracing, the following could work too: m4_copy([AC_DEFUN],

Re: FYI: loop in libtool m4 macros

2005-06-27 Thread Stepan Kasal
. AC_FOREACH was never documented, so there is no problem if you replace it by three other undocumented macros. ;-) Have a nice day, Stepan 2005-06-27 Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] * m4/ltoptions.m4 (_LT_UNLESS_OPTIONS, _LT_SET_OPTIONS): Replace AC_FOREACH

Re: FYI: loop in libtool m4 macros

2005-06-27 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi Ralf, On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:55:18PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: So I propose the following patch. I agree, and have committed it to HEAD and branch-2-0. thank you for committing this patch. (And also the other one I posted today.) Stepan

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-12 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:25:32AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Where do we send it? Direct to rms? I'd say assign or copyright-clerk are better (at gnu.org, of course). Stepan ___ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]