Hello Bob, Max, all,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:26:25AM CEST:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Is there any way that I can have libtool simply create a dll with the
new 'pcre.dll' instead of 'libpcre-0.dll'? Otherwise, I'll have to code
into
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:04:12AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Bob, Max, all,
* Bob Rossi wrote on Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:26:25AM CEST:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
Is there any way that I can have libtool simply create a dll with the
new
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:12:49PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Bob Rossi wrote:
I've recently converted pcre's (http://www.pcre.org/) build
system to use the autotools.
The previous stable version of libtool, pcre-7.0, used
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:23:20PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Bob Rossi wrote:
I've recently converted pcre's (http://www.pcre.org/) build
system to use the autotools.
The previous stable version of libtool, pcre-7.0, used to create dll's
on mingw. It would create
$ ls .libs/*.dll
Bob Rossi wrote:
I've recently converted pcre's (http://www.pcre.org/) build
system to use the autotools.
The previous stable version of libtool, pcre-7.0, used to create dll's
on mingw. It would create
$ ls .libs/*.dll
Hi,
I'm mostly new to libtool, so please be patient if I'm misinformed.
I've recently converted pcre's (http://www.pcre.org/) build
system to use the autotools.
The previous stable version of libtool, pcre-7.0, used to create dll's
on mingw. It would create
$ ls .libs/*.dll
