On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:50:51PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:50:51PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to
of the patch that adds the directories only when they
exist. I think this a pretty safe default for 64 bit systems.
--
Dan
Subject: [PATCH] Add 64 bit directories to sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec for Linux
ELF
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library path so
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:50:51PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library path so that an RPATH is not added when using libraries
from these directories.
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library path so that an RPATH is not added when using libraries
from these directories.
Signed-off-by: Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com
---
libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 15
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library path so that an RPATH is not added when using libraries
from these directories.
Are these libraries consistently available for 64-bit Linux? If not,
should they be
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Dan Nicholson wrote:
When the ABI is 64-bit on Linux ELF, add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 to the
system library path so that an RPATH is not added when using libraries
from these directories.
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 12:01 -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
If they follow the LSB, then they should be using lib64. However, you
can configure the linker any number of ways. I tried to get a patch to
glibc so this path could be determined, but it was rejected.
