Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Schwab wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:43:25PM CET: 16. convenience.at:69: testing ... ./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } || (exit 77) libtool: compile: g++ -c main1.cpp -o .libs/main1.o /usr/src/packages/BUILD/libtool-2.1b/libtool: line 821:

[libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Schwab
16. convenience.at:69: testing ... ./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } || (exit 77) libtool: compile: g++ -c main1.cpp -o .libs/main1.o /usr/src/packages/BUILD/libtool-2.1b/libtool: line 821: g++: command not found libtool: compile: g++ -c a1.cpp -o .libs/a1.o

Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Schwab
Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have a C++ compiler installed? No. What did configure report in the 'checking for g++' test? checking for g++... no checking for c++... no checking for gpp... no checking for aCC... no checking for CC... no checking for cxx... no checking for

Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Andreas, Thanks for the report. What architecture is this building on? On 1 Feb 2008, at 22:43, Andreas Schwab wrote: 16. convenience.at:69: testing ... ./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } || (exit 77) So CXX is a non-zero length string other than no, or this

Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote: Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have a C++ compiler installed? No. I have a similar situation with Fortran since I have no other use for a Fortran compiler. In order to make the tests happy, I set both F77 and FC to 'no' in my

Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: DTRT. There should be no need to tweak config.site for CXX if F77 and FC are handled transparently... It would be nice if F77 and FC were properly handled transparently. Make it so! :-) It seems that in Andreas's environment 'g++' appears out of

Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On 2 Feb 2008, at 01:02, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote: Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have a C++ compiler installed? No. I have a similar situation with Fortran since I have no other use for a Fortran compiler. In order to make the

Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Schwab
Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote: Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Do you have a C++ compiler installed? No. I have a similar situation with Fortran since I have no other use for a Fortran compiler. In order to make the tests

Re: [libtool 2.1b] testsuite: 16 54 55 56 failed

2008-02-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Schwab wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:43:25PM CET: 16. convenience.at:69: testing ... ./convenience.at:70: { test -n $CXX test X$CXX != Xno; } || (exit 77) libtool: compile: g++ -c main1.cpp -o .libs/main1.o /usr/src/packages/BUILD/libtool-2.1b/libtool: line 821: